International Cricket
- ShezaPunter
-
- New Member
-
- Thanks: 0
Re: Re: International Cricket
12 years 7 months ago
I'm sure Imran Tahir is a Right Arm leg break? Not a left arm spinner!
And its unfair to attack the lad 4 what happened. He was thrown in the Deep end due to the injuries of steyn n Kallis. A leg spinner is not meant to bowl 20overs on day one esp when the batting side has come out all guns blazing and are in top form. Imran will be dangerous in any innings onday 3/5 not 1/2. He is a leg break, and is there to take advantage of an old pitch that's got rough patches and is breaking up. Trust me this lad Is the best leg break in SA. And he can tk wickets. Just not in the way that has been expected of him today
And its unfair to attack the lad 4 what happened. He was thrown in the Deep end due to the injuries of steyn n Kallis. A leg spinner is not meant to bowl 20overs on day one esp when the batting side has come out all guns blazing and are in top form. Imran will be dangerous in any innings onday 3/5 not 1/2. He is a leg break, and is there to take advantage of an old pitch that's got rough patches and is breaking up. Trust me this lad Is the best leg break in SA. And he can tk wickets. Just not in the way that has been expected of him today
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Englander
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 11538
- Thanks: 829
Re: Re: International Cricket
12 years 7 months ago
Interested Sheza... you don't call someone who bowls leg breaks a spinner?
And as said before, yes it is partly unfair but he is a professional bowler etc and professionals should be able to adjust a little, he really did bowl some complete rubbish.
Shame about the last wicket stand, was trying to get 12s the SA win but computer was being stupid, last wicket went and ended up having to take 9s which though almost double the current price, I still think is short
And as said before, yes it is partly unfair but he is a professional bowler etc and professionals should be able to adjust a little, he really did bowl some complete rubbish.
Shame about the last wicket stand, was trying to get 12s the SA win but computer was being stupid, last wicket went and ended up having to take 9s which though almost double the current price, I still think is short
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- gg
-
- Premium Member
-
- Posts: 410
- Thanks: 8
Re: Re: International Cricket
12 years 7 months ago
Why all these injuries including JD. ??????
Too much fishing !!!!!
Too much fishing !!!!!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- gregbucks
-
- New Member
-
- Thanks: 0
Re: Re: International Cricket
12 years 7 months ago
Englander Wrote:
> Interested Sheza... you don't call someone who
> bowls leg breaks a spinner?
> And as said before, yes it is partly unfair but he
> is a professional bowler etc and professionals
> should be able to adjust a little, he really did
> bowl some complete rubbish.
> Shame about the last wicket stand, was trying to
> get 12s the SA win but computer was being stupid,
> last wicket went and ended up having to take 9s
> which though almost double the current price, I
> still think is short
Now that is an idiots bet dude...
<
> Interested Sheza... you don't call someone who
> bowls leg breaks a spinner?
> And as said before, yes it is partly unfair but he
> is a professional bowler etc and professionals
> should be able to adjust a little, he really did
> bowl some complete rubbish.
> Shame about the last wicket stand, was trying to
> get 12s the SA win but computer was being stupid,
> last wicket went and ended up having to take 9s
> which though almost double the current price, I
> still think is short
Now that is an idiots bet dude...

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Frodo
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 13144
- Thanks: 3040
Re: Re: International Cricket
12 years 7 months ago
I think you'll get the 12's now, Englander - poor shot attempted by Amla; pity really - after all they did in the first 2 sessions to give themselves some sort of chance of a draw, the Proteas are now starting to slip - it boggles the mind how an experienced cricketer like Peterson can run himself out in that fashion ............... one for the first things you learn at school level is to run straight :S
And the wicket is starting to turn .... I think batting is going to become more difficult from tomorrow onwards
And the wicket is starting to turn .... I think batting is going to become more difficult from tomorrow onwards
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- shrek
-
- New Member
-
- Thanks: 0
Re: Re: International Cricket
12 years 7 months ago
Well done Smith great knock, keep going now. He always comes to the party when the team needs him most. (tu)
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- ShezaPunter
-
- New Member
-
- Thanks: 0
Re: Re: International Cricket
12 years 7 months ago
@ Englander,lol. No I'm saying he is a right handed leg spinner, not a left arm spinner. As I read someones post calling him a left arm spinner. I maybe wrong about the post though.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- PeeKay
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 7885
- Thanks: 223
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Ou Ryperd
-
Topic Author
- New Member
-
- Thanks: 0
Re: Re: International Cricket
12 years 7 months ago
Australia 550
South Africa 215/2 (64.3 ov)
South Africa trail by 335 runs with 8 wickets remaining in the 1st innings
South Africa 1st innings R B 4s 6s SR
GC Smith* not out 109 216 12 0 50.46
AN Petersen run out (Hussey) 54 112 7 0 48.21
HM Amla st †Wade b Warner 11 26 2 0 42.30
JA Rudolph not out 25 37 2 0 67.56
Extras (b 7, lb 2, w 3, nb 4) 16
Total (2 wickets; 64.3 overs) 215 (3.33 runs per over)
South Africa 215/2 (64.3 ov)
South Africa trail by 335 runs with 8 wickets remaining in the 1st innings
South Africa 1st innings R B 4s 6s SR
GC Smith* not out 109 216 12 0 50.46
AN Petersen run out (Hussey) 54 112 7 0 48.21
HM Amla st †Wade b Warner 11 26 2 0 42.30
JA Rudolph not out 25 37 2 0 67.56
Extras (b 7, lb 2, w 3, nb 4) 16
Total (2 wickets; 64.3 overs) 215 (3.33 runs per over)
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- PeeKay
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 7885
- Thanks: 223
Re: Re: International Cricket
12 years 7 months ago
Ou Ryperd Wrote:
> Australia 550
> South Africa 215/2 (64.3 ov)
> South Africa trail by 335 runs with 8 wickets
> remaining in the 1st innings
>
> South Africa 1st innings R B 4s 6s SR
> GC Smith* not out 109 216 12 0 50.46
> AN Petersen run out (Hussey) 54 112 7 0 48.21
> HM Amla st †Wade b Warner 11 26 2 0 42.30
> JA Rudolph not out 25 37 2 0 67.56
> Extras (b 7, lb 2, w 3, nb 4) 16
>
> Total (2 wickets; 64.3 overs) 215 (3.33 runs per
> over)
Thanks OR.........so our bowlers came to the party this morning?
> Australia 550
> South Africa 215/2 (64.3 ov)
> South Africa trail by 335 runs with 8 wickets
> remaining in the 1st innings
>
> South Africa 1st innings R B 4s 6s SR
> GC Smith* not out 109 216 12 0 50.46
> AN Petersen run out (Hussey) 54 112 7 0 48.21
> HM Amla st †Wade b Warner 11 26 2 0 42.30
> JA Rudolph not out 25 37 2 0 67.56
> Extras (b 7, lb 2, w 3, nb 4) 16
>
> Total (2 wickets; 64.3 overs) 215 (3.33 runs per
> over)
Thanks OR.........so our bowlers came to the party this morning?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Ou Ryperd
-
Topic Author
- New Member
-
- Thanks: 0
Re: Re: International Cricket
12 years 7 months ago
PeeKay Wrote:
> Ou Ryperd Wrote:
>
>
> > Australia 550
> > South Africa 215/2 (64.3 ov)
> > South Africa trail by 335 runs with 8 wickets
> > remaining in the 1st innings
> >
> > South Africa 1st innings R B 4s 6s SR
> > GC Smith* not out 109 216 12 0 50.46
> > AN Petersen run out (Hussey) 54 112 7 0 48.21
> > HM Amla st †Wade b Warner 11 26 2 0 42.30
> > JA Rudolph not out 25 37 2 0 67.56
> > Extras (b 7, lb 2, w 3, nb 4) 16
> >
> > Total (2 wickets; 64.3 overs) 215 (3.33 runs
> per
> > over)
>
>
> Thanks OR.........so our bowlers came to the party
> this morning?
Morkel got 5
> Ou Ryperd Wrote:
>
>
> > Australia 550
> > South Africa 215/2 (64.3 ov)
> > South Africa trail by 335 runs with 8 wickets
> > remaining in the 1st innings
> >
> > South Africa 1st innings R B 4s 6s SR
> > GC Smith* not out 109 216 12 0 50.46
> > AN Petersen run out (Hussey) 54 112 7 0 48.21
> > HM Amla st †Wade b Warner 11 26 2 0 42.30
> > JA Rudolph not out 25 37 2 0 67.56
> > Extras (b 7, lb 2, w 3, nb 4) 16
> >
> > Total (2 wickets; 64.3 overs) 215 (3.33 runs
> per
> > over)
>
>
> Thanks OR.........so our bowlers came to the party
> this morning?
Morkel got 5
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- davetheflower
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 11060
- Thanks: 534
Re: Re: International Cricket
12 years 7 months ago
England are going well against India
Panesar already got 3 wickets and India are 119 for 5
Panesar already got 3 wickets and India are 119 for 5
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.113 seconds