Heynecke Meyer

He was, but is back now for WP against the Lions...

O ok, then I do agree. De Jongh brilliant on defence, and got a side step of biblical proportion. Would like to hear Meyer's reasoning... Cause we all know it can't be lack of match practise....

Karma wrote: O ok, then I do agree. De Jongh brilliant on defence, and got a side step of biblical proportion. Would like to hear Meyer's reasoning... Cause we all know it can't be lack of match practise....

Unfortunately your request for hearing Meyers reasoning wont be forth coming because Meyer is only answerable to one person, and that's himself.

If a back-line player is not at least 6 + ft and 100 +kg, HM considers them small so lots of players may be skillful and fast but to HM size matters so they have no chance of playing whilst he is coach...

Still some unresolved injuries (Victor and Fourie chief among them) from Saturday so no team announcement as yet...heard that it will be announced by 6pm today...

chicken n chips wrote:

Karma wrote: O ok, then I do agree. De Jongh brilliant on defence, and got a side step of biblical proportion. Would like to hear Meyer's reasoning... Cause we all know it can't be lack of match practise....

Unfortunately your request for hearing Meyers reasoning wont be forth coming because Meyer is only answerable to one person, and that's himself.

Hahaha... In this case, one wonders if there are any " unanswerable" questions raised, from himself, to himself....lol...

Karma wrote:

chicken n chips wrote:

Karma wrote: O ok, then I do agree. De Jongh brilliant on defence, and got a side step of biblical proportion. Would like to hear Meyer's reasoning... Cause we all know it can't be lack of match practise....

Unfortunately your request for hearing Meyers reasoning wont be forth coming because Meyer is only answerable to one person, and that's himself.

Hahaha... In this case, one wonders if there are any " unanswerable" questions raised, from himself, to himself....lol...

:lol: :lol:

as per usual Meyer announces his team on a Wednesday. Snoek has more of a bite than the three Sharks that yet again form the front row, Bismark a red card in waiting. Other than that a good team selected and should over come the Scots who will have at least 40 thousand supporting them. It will be like a home game as Newcastle is just down the road from Scotland

We going to smash that scottish boys just like samoa....properly


would have loved to see schalk brits on bench to run riot in 2nd half, but we will still cruise past these guys and we will score 5+ tries


goooooooo bokke

Well the weather been good for sat in new castle and the bokke pull a good win and
then I will enjoy a good cold New Castle Brown ale best ale here after the game :woohoo:

Lambie , is hardly 6ft or 100kg and will be the weak link if he gets onto the field against a decent side . De Jong, aplon, colby are small but offer that x factor which is missing from our backline . You couldn't play them together but they have the ability to create chaos off the bench in the last 15 min.

aluminium wrote: Lambie , is hardly 6ft or 100kg and will be the weak link if he gets onto the field against a decent side . De Jong, aplon, colby are small but offer that x factor which is missing from our backline . You couldn't play them together but they have the ability to create chaos off the bench in the last 15 min.

You are right.... Lambie is neither 6FT or 100 kg... And if you look at previous posts, I have mentiond De Jongh should have been there ather than Serfontein.. However, which one of the 3 that you mentioned actually play flyhalf? Lambie is there firstly as a flyhalf that can cover other positions due to his versitility... Which other flyhalf would you have? Cause I'm sure you not going to say Morne Steyn has more X factor than Lambie.... Last thing, I guess being involved in 2 or 3 tries in the last few minutes after coming off the bench doesn't constitute as having X factor does it?

Karma , rugby is a team game , everybody should be involved. If he was creating , well that would be different.