SOMETIMES U KNOW BEFORE ITS OVER

Davashan Wrote:

---

> I agree that we as punters are not jockeys, but
> sometimes when u watch the jock ride your horse, u
> realise quiet early that he is running for second,
> by keeping the horse boxed in, or going for a run
> down the inside at Clairwood, when we all know
> that the going is better on the outside.
>
> Royal Zulu Guard was running second, and no real
> attempt by Delpech.

Clairwood is the fairest it has been in years....
Horses can win down the inside if good enough

@ Pirates....all done and dusted:D:D....lets study the card and find some winners now...we need to end the year on a positive note...

CHIPPY Wrote:

---

> Davashan Wrote:
>

---

>

---

> > I agree that we as punters are not jockeys, but
> > sometimes when u watch the jock ride your horse,
> u
> > realise quiet early that he is running for
> second,
> > by keeping the horse boxed in, or going for a
> run
> > down the inside at Clairwood, when we all know
> > that the going is better on the outside.
> >
> > Royal Zulu Guard was running second, and no
> real
> > attempt by Delpech.
>
> Clairwood is the fairest it has been in years....
> Horses can win down the inside if good enough


kevin shea has said that numerous times in interviews but the grandstand experts as always know better

The 1st post insinuates that Anthony is riding for 2nd and not trying to win. Firstly that is libelous and secondly I was standing next to Tony, Anthony and Mr Moodley and they were confident of a huge run and probably winning. To say that Anthony was not trying is shit no matter which way you put it. That is one thing wrong about these forums. A person can say what he wants from behind his psuedonym and there will be someone who actually believes him. If you have proof or are that sure that Anthony did not try then go to the Stipes and report it. By reading a post like this and not saying a word is either showing that I agree with it or condone people writing shit in the name of an "opinion". I will do neither.

Something stranger than going down the inside ,is betting a horse that shouldnt beat the fav,to win <

i agree with davashan,

i backed lindeman legacy and FOR sure delpech and marcus conspired to beat me

@Craig .... then disagree with him and give your reasoning. Point out why you believe he is wrong... in my opinion Pirates response is one of an intolerant person with no regard for others views and opinions.

The Madji Wrote:

---

> @Craig .... then disagree with him and give your
> reasoning. Point out why you believe he is
> wrong... in my opinion Pirates response is one of
> an intolerant person with no regard for others
> views and opinions.


views and opinions like saying a jock is crook when he clearly wasnt no i dont have time for...believe me iv seen a few crookies in the cape the last few months but because they not in the betting nobody picks up on them .....opinions are like aasholes

The Madji Wrote:

---

> @Craig .... then disagree with him and give your
> reasoning. Point out why you believe he is
> wrong... in my opinion Pirates response is one of
> an intolerant person with no regard for others
> views and opinions.


{ Moerse groot lepel nou in die pot}

It ain't over until the Fatlady/ Fatman sings. Wait for the Allclear.(

The Madgi, I am prepared to do that. The problem is that I am not sure what makes him say Anthony was not trying. If Davashan will point out where this happened or what made him think that. The photo finish shows Anthony on Anton's outside.

pirates Wrote:

---

> yes its fine to come on here and say a jockey
> wasnt trying to win ,let it be one of titches clan
> of riders and he would have sworn him from one
> side to the next as he has done before...as for
> respect you dont buy it at pick n pay you earn
> it...happy new year all you geniuses


but my "clan of riders" are all angels P so they NEVER do anything wrong happy new year to you too and thanks for the last 12 months of pleasantries you have bestaowed on me, i cant wait for the next 12 months