Computaform sprint Merit ratings 8 May 2018

  • pirates
  • New Member
  • New Member
  • Thanks: 0

Re: Computaform sprint Merit ratings 8 May 2018

7 years 1 week ago
#727968
what has stakes earned got to do with a horses merit rating?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Interbet
  • oscar
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 4128
  • Thanks: 327

Re: Computaform sprint Merit ratings 8 May 2018

7 years 1 week ago
#727969
:ohmy:

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Sylvester
  • Topic Author
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 13961
  • Thanks: 1416

Re: Computaform sprint Merit ratings 8 May 2018

7 years 1 week ago
#728009
Sargent Hardy 119
Bold Respect 118
PP up to 115 after the week end. equal to Monkmood rating another 3yr old.
Attenborough 114

year in year out the sprinters ratings are to high.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • drdom
  • Elite Member
  • Elite Member
  • Posts: 1145
  • Thanks: 116

Re: Computaform sprint Merit ratings 8 May 2018

7 years 1 week ago - 7 years 1 week ago
#728012
Not really if you consider the 6 point increase. It would not be considered over the top if Bold respects rating was 112 which it boils down to without the one off penalty given this season.

I think the gasping at the numbers is an illusion given because of the 6point coming in, and then people compring them vs the last few years before the overall rise in ratings across the board.
Last edit: 7 years 1 week ago by drdom.
The following user(s) said Thank You: mr hawaii

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Mac
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 12013
  • Thanks: 940

Re: Re:Computaform sprint Merit ratings 8 May 2018

7 years 1 week ago
#728033
oscar wrote: I disagree with you Mac on what basis do you say that? Why put a horse up immediately after one race 9 points?? Very fast up very slow down, he didn't win the race he ran second..again.

I gave him a 114 using Sunset Eyes ( I think) as the fulcrum horse. With no consideration to races won, nor stakes earned, nor position ran. Not sure if I should celebrate or cry but I’ll buy the bucket of beers.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

HOLLYWOOD 468 NEW
  • Frodo
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 13120
  • Thanks: 3032

Re: Re:Computaform sprint Merit ratings 8 May 2018

7 years 1 week ago
#728044
Mac wrote:
oscar wrote: I disagree with you Mac on what basis do you say that? Why put a horse up immediately after one race 9 points?? Very fast up very slow down, he didn't win the race he ran second..again.

I gave him a 114 using Sunset Eyes ( I think) as the fulcrum horse. With no consideration to races won, nor stakes earned, nor position ran. Not sure if I should celebrate or cry but I’ll buy the bucket of beers.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I also think Sunset Eyes is the best suited to use as 'line horse' - on my calcs that would make BR 114, PP 111 (much the same as his Computaform Sprint rating) and Attenborough 110 (also the same as my Computaform Sprint rating)

Oscar, I have big respect for you, in this case maybe just accept that you have a very good sprinter on your hands - and the rating should reflect that; all the best with this fellow going forward B)
The following user(s) said Thank You: oscar

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • oscar
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 4128
  • Thanks: 327

Re: Re:Computaform sprint Merit ratings 8 May 2018

7 years 1 week ago
#728056
Thanks Frodo, I too respect posters such as yourself, Elvis, Shrek, Sylvester, Mac etc however some posters on this site are just here to cause trouble and stir behind anonymous names and thats why most racing people laugh at the site and ask why do you post there which is unfortunate.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • drdom
  • Elite Member
  • Elite Member
  • Posts: 1145
  • Thanks: 116

Re: Computaform sprint Merit ratings 8 May 2018

7 years 1 week ago
#728146
The Mercury sprint will be interesting as the sprinter of the year category is going to be contentious unless one of the G1 winners doubles up or PP wins.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • pirates
  • New Member
  • New Member
  • Thanks: 0

Re: Computaform sprint Merit ratings 8 May 2018

7 years 1 week ago
#728147
drdom wrote: The Mercury sprint will be interesting as the sprinter of the year category is going to be contentious unless one of the G1 winners doubles up or PP wins.
They must seriously consider moving this prestigious group 1 wfa race to scotsville as its way to draw bias being run around the turn at greyville ..it was always run up the straight before tragedy struck

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Dave Scott
  • Administrator
  • Administrator
  • Posts: 43867
  • Thanks: 3338

Re: Computaform sprint Merit ratings 8 May 2018

7 years 1 week ago
#728315
I notice HW have started to price up on a few runners for the Merchants

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

4 RACING JULY
  • oscar
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 4128
  • Thanks: 327

Re: Computaform sprint Merit ratings 8 May 2018

7 years 1 week ago - 7 years 1 week ago
#728341
For the punters here I would place maximum bet on Bold Respect I see 33/10 anything that beats PP over 1200m and is not racing against PP will win.
Last edit: 7 years 1 week ago by oscar. Reason: spelling

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Bob Brogan
  • Administrator
  • Administrator
  • Posts: 82474
  • Thanks: 6449

Re: Computaform sprint Merit ratings 8 May 2018

7 years 1 week ago
#728344
Dave Scott wrote: I notice HW have started to price up on a few runners for the Merchants

WSB priced up

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.125 seconds