Objection Ruling.

Tigershark
Elite Member
Posts: 1636
Thanks: 416

Re: Objection Ruling.

8 years 9 months ago

#631997

This has to be one of the lowest points for SA racing and needs vigorous legal challenge or there will be no change. An official result cannot be declared in this situation or the entire system is open to major manipulation.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Deva G
Senior Member
Posts: 225
Thanks: 17

Re: Objection Ruling.

8 years 9 months ago

#632003

Someone please tell me how could a seasoned rider like Karl Zeckner object in the first place...
He should have known better than to lodge a stupid objection???

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

winzip
Elite Member
Posts: 1867
Thanks: 83

Re: Objection Ruling.

8 years 9 months ago

#632007

Deva G wrote: Someone please tell me how could a seasoned rider like Karl Zeckner object in the first place...
He should have known better than to lodge a stupid objection???

Money,probably his and the stable's.Remember money is the root of all evil.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Raceover
New Member
Thanks: 0

Re: Objection Ruling.

8 years 9 months ago

#632008

winzip wrote:

Deva G wrote: Someone please tell me how could a seasoned rider like Karl Zeckner object in the first place...
He should have known better than to lodge a stupid objection???

Money,probably his and the stable's.Remember money is the root of all evil.[/quote

No jockey bets with his own money. They find desparate gamblers who they entice to bet on the next good thing.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

ElvisisKing
Platinum Member
Posts: 7876
Thanks: 912

Re: Objection Ruling.

8 years 9 months ago

#632015

Deva G read earlier posts.

The following user(s) said Thank You: Deva G

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

SirPuntalot
Platinum Member
Posts: 2131
Thanks: 150

Re: Objection Ruling.

8 years 9 months ago

#632092

Whaaaaat the faaaaaaark
Been off since friday
Checked all this now and absolute shit eish faaaark me
How this stood i will never know!
Punters should smashed the stipes for this!
Do this in greyville and watch the stands fall!
Damn

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

SirPuntalot
Platinum Member
Posts: 2131
Thanks: 150

Re: Objection Ruling.

8 years 9 months ago

#632094

SirPuntalot wrote: Whaaaaat the faaaaaaark
Been off since friday
Checked all this now and absolute shit eish faaaark me
How this stood i will never know!
Punters should've smashed the stipes for this!
Do this in greyville and watch the stands fall!
Damn

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

whoosh
New Member
Posts: 15
Thanks: 3

Re: Objection Ruling.

8 years 9 months ago

#632095

From a good source

3 stipes sat on objection. 1 voted to abstain. 1 voted to overrule. 1 voted to uphold then used his casting vote to uphold.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

MasterOfMyFate
Platinum Member
Posts: 2326
Thanks: 458

Re: Objection Ruling.

8 years 9 months ago

#632096

^if true then wtf? how is that a majority.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Bob Brogan
Administrator
Posts: 82524
Thanks: 6461

Re: Objection Ruling.

8 years 9 months ago

#632099

whoosh wrote: From a good source

3 stipes sat on objection. 1 voted to abstain. 1 voted to overrule. 1 voted to uphold then used his casting vote to uphold.

How can a Stipe abstain ? The casting vote I understand

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

mr hawaii
Platinum Member
Posts: 20068
Thanks: 2653

Re: Objection Ruling.

8 years 9 months ago

#632101

Bob Brogan wrote:

whoosh wrote: From a good source

3 stipes sat on objection. 1 voted to abstain. 1 voted to overrule. 1 voted to uphold then used his casting vote to uphold.

How can a Stipe abstain ? The casting vote I understand

This is not an election... Imagine if the Judge decided to abstain because a race was too close to call!!They are paid to make judgments... only the person who voted to overrule should be allowed to continue... the other three should be retrained and should be demoted to trainee stipes as they are obviously not proficient enough to hold "stipe" status...

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.