Paul Peter fined R650 000
- Over the Air
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 2948
- Thanks: 721
Re: Paul Peter fined R650 000
8 years 11 months ago
Dave if a fine has been imposed and gets paid then obviously it just carries on. What else could happen if the guilty accepts the verdict and pays the sanction?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- PeeKay
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 7885
- Thanks: 223
Re: Paul Peter fined R650 000
8 years 11 months ago
Where is the notes or article for the offence
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- elmer
-
- Premium Member
-
- Posts: 384
- Thanks: 35
Re: Paul Peter fined R650 000
8 years 11 months ago
I am sure the R650k will be multiple fines for various transgressions not for 1 offence
Easy when a steroid costs R100k
Lucky by all accounts not to lose his licence
Easy when a steroid costs R100k
Lucky by all accounts not to lose his licence
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- PeeKay
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 7885
- Thanks: 223
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Bob Brogan
-
Topic Author
- Administrator
-
- Posts: 82520
- Thanks: 6460
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- savasp
-
- Premium Member
-
- Posts: 892
- Thanks: 295
Re: Paul Peter fined R650 000
8 years 11 months ago
Lets wait for the official documents , if I remember correctly it was about moving horses , so therefore could be amount of horses x the Fine that is why it is such a large amount.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- cycad
-
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 202
- Thanks: 12
Re: Paul Peter fined R650 000
8 years 11 months ago
Article posted on NHRA webpage , maybe some one can download for clanners
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Bob Brogan
-
Topic Author
- Administrator
-
- Posts: 82520
- Thanks: 6460
Re: Paul Peter fined R650 000
8 years 11 months ago
TRAINER PAUL PETER FINED
1. An Inquiry was finalised on 6 July 2016.
2. Mr Peter had been charged with:-
2.1 two contraventions of Rule 74.1 in that specimens taken from the horse MOGOK MASTER and from the horse FORT EMBER, at his racing stables at Summerveld on 20 July 2015, were found, upon analysis, to contain testosterone propionate, a forbidden substance in terms of Rule 74.2;
2.2 two contraventions of Rule 10.5.16.5 in that certain used needles and syringes seized by officials of The National Horseracing Authority at Mr Peter’s racing stables at Summerveld and at Mr Peter’s racing stables at the Vaal Racecourse, on 7 August 2015, were found, upon analysis, to contain, inter alia, testosterone propionate, a forbidden substance in terms of Rule 74.2; and
2.3 a contravention of Rule 72.1.18 in that Mr Peter, on 7 August 2015, during the course of a visit to and inspection at his Vaal racing stables by a licensed official, Mr Janse van Rensburg, intimidated and/or threatened the licensed official.
3. Mr Peter pleaded not guilty to all the charges. The Inquiry Board however found him guilty as charged.
4. Although the contravention of Rule 74.1 related to two separate specimens, the Board treated both charges as one for the purpose of penalty and imposed a fine of R400,000.00.
5. Although the contravention of Rule 10.5.16.5 related to two incidents, the Board treated both charges as one for the purpose of penalty and imposed a fine of R200,000.00.
6. In respect of the contravention of Rule 72.1.18, the Board imposed a penalty of a fine of R50,000.00, of which R20,000.00 is to be suspended for a period of two years on condition that Mr Peter is not found guilty of a further contravention of Rule 72.1.18 over that period.
1. An Inquiry was finalised on 6 July 2016.
2. Mr Peter had been charged with:-
2.1 two contraventions of Rule 74.1 in that specimens taken from the horse MOGOK MASTER and from the horse FORT EMBER, at his racing stables at Summerveld on 20 July 2015, were found, upon analysis, to contain testosterone propionate, a forbidden substance in terms of Rule 74.2;
2.2 two contraventions of Rule 10.5.16.5 in that certain used needles and syringes seized by officials of The National Horseracing Authority at Mr Peter’s racing stables at Summerveld and at Mr Peter’s racing stables at the Vaal Racecourse, on 7 August 2015, were found, upon analysis, to contain, inter alia, testosterone propionate, a forbidden substance in terms of Rule 74.2; and
2.3 a contravention of Rule 72.1.18 in that Mr Peter, on 7 August 2015, during the course of a visit to and inspection at his Vaal racing stables by a licensed official, Mr Janse van Rensburg, intimidated and/or threatened the licensed official.
3. Mr Peter pleaded not guilty to all the charges. The Inquiry Board however found him guilty as charged.
4. Although the contravention of Rule 74.1 related to two separate specimens, the Board treated both charges as one for the purpose of penalty and imposed a fine of R400,000.00.
5. Although the contravention of Rule 10.5.16.5 related to two incidents, the Board treated both charges as one for the purpose of penalty and imposed a fine of R200,000.00.
6. In respect of the contravention of Rule 72.1.18, the Board imposed a penalty of a fine of R50,000.00, of which R20,000.00 is to be suspended for a period of two years on condition that Mr Peter is not found guilty of a further contravention of Rule 72.1.18 over that period.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Solotrama
-
- New Member
-
- Thanks: 0
Re: Paul Peter fined R650 000
8 years 11 months ago
TRAINER PAUL PETER FINED
1. An Inquiry was finalised on 6 July 2016.
2. Mr Peter had been charged with:-
2.1 two contraventions of Rule 74.1 in that specimens taken from the horse MOGOK MASTER and from the horse FORT EMBER, at his racing stables at Summerveld on 20 July 2015, were found, upon analysis, to contain testosterone propionate, a forbidden substance in terms of Rule 74.2;
2.2 two contraventions of Rule 10.5.16.5 in that certain used needles and syringes seized by officials of The National Horseracing Authority at Mr Peter’s racing stables at Summerveld and at Mr Peter’s racing stables at the Vaal Racecourse, on 7 August 2015, were found, upon analysis, to contain, inter alia, testosterone propionate, a forbidden substance in terms of Rule 74.2; and
2.3 a contravention of Rule 72.1.18 in that Mr Peter, on 7 August 2015, during the course of a visit to and inspection at his Vaal racing stables by a licensed official, Mr Janse van Rensburg, intimidated and/or threatened the licensed official.
3. Mr Peter pleaded not guilty to all the charges. The Inquiry Board however found him guilty as charged.
4. Although the contravention of Rule 74.1 related to two separate specimens, the Board treated both charges as one for the purpose of penalty and imposed a fine of R400,000.00.
5. Although the contravention of Rule 10.5.16.5 related to two incidents, the Board treated both charges as one for the purpose of penalty and imposed a fine of R200,000.00.
6. In respect of the contravention of Rule 72.1.18, the Board imposed a penalty of a fine of R50,000.00, of which R20,000.00 is to be suspended for a period of two years on condition that Mr Peter is not found guilty of a further contravention of Rule 72.1.18 over that period.
www.nhra.co.za/common/newsitem.php?url=176
1. An Inquiry was finalised on 6 July 2016.
2. Mr Peter had been charged with:-
2.1 two contraventions of Rule 74.1 in that specimens taken from the horse MOGOK MASTER and from the horse FORT EMBER, at his racing stables at Summerveld on 20 July 2015, were found, upon analysis, to contain testosterone propionate, a forbidden substance in terms of Rule 74.2;
2.2 two contraventions of Rule 10.5.16.5 in that certain used needles and syringes seized by officials of The National Horseracing Authority at Mr Peter’s racing stables at Summerveld and at Mr Peter’s racing stables at the Vaal Racecourse, on 7 August 2015, were found, upon analysis, to contain, inter alia, testosterone propionate, a forbidden substance in terms of Rule 74.2; and
2.3 a contravention of Rule 72.1.18 in that Mr Peter, on 7 August 2015, during the course of a visit to and inspection at his Vaal racing stables by a licensed official, Mr Janse van Rensburg, intimidated and/or threatened the licensed official.
3. Mr Peter pleaded not guilty to all the charges. The Inquiry Board however found him guilty as charged.
4. Although the contravention of Rule 74.1 related to two separate specimens, the Board treated both charges as one for the purpose of penalty and imposed a fine of R400,000.00.
5. Although the contravention of Rule 10.5.16.5 related to two incidents, the Board treated both charges as one for the purpose of penalty and imposed a fine of R200,000.00.
6. In respect of the contravention of Rule 72.1.18, the Board imposed a penalty of a fine of R50,000.00, of which R20,000.00 is to be suspended for a period of two years on condition that Mr Peter is not found guilty of a further contravention of Rule 72.1.18 over that period.
www.nhra.co.za/common/newsitem.php?url=176
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- savasp
-
- Premium Member
-
- Posts: 892
- Thanks: 295
Re: Paul Peter fined R650 000
8 years 11 months ago
Thanks Bob
At least the Stipes were consistant:=
2.3 a contravention of Rule 72.1.18 in that Mr Peter, on 7 August 2015, during the course of a visit to and inspection at his Vaal racing stables by a licensed official, Mr Janse van Rensburg, intimidated and/or threatened the licensed official.
6. In respect of the contravention of Rule 72.1.18, the Board imposed a penalty of a fine of R50,000.00, of which R20,000.00 is to be suspended for a period of two years on condition that Mr Peter is not found guilty of a further contravention of Rule 72.1.18 over that period.
Same amount as the Larry .
At least the Stipes were consistant:=
2.3 a contravention of Rule 72.1.18 in that Mr Peter, on 7 August 2015, during the course of a visit to and inspection at his Vaal racing stables by a licensed official, Mr Janse van Rensburg, intimidated and/or threatened the licensed official.
6. In respect of the contravention of Rule 72.1.18, the Board imposed a penalty of a fine of R50,000.00, of which R20,000.00 is to be suspended for a period of two years on condition that Mr Peter is not found guilty of a further contravention of Rule 72.1.18 over that period.
Same amount as the Larry .
The following user(s) said Thank You: Lionel
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Bob Brogan
-
Topic Author
- Administrator
-
- Posts: 82520
- Thanks: 6460
Re: Paul Peter fined R650 000
8 years 11 months ago
Savasp your going to make me sound like I'm defending Larry again 
It's a million times different
Larry was defending his honour
The Nhra guy was trying to investigate an issue and was kindly asked to leave

It's a million times different
Larry was defending his honour

The Nhra guy was trying to investigate an issue and was kindly asked to leave
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- savasp
-
- Premium Member
-
- Posts: 892
- Thanks: 295
Re: Paul Peter fined R650 000
8 years 11 months ago
:lol: No we are not going there again.
The NHRA guy should not be intimidated, he should have just turn the other cheek, and got the hell out of there.
The NHRA guy should not be intimidated, he should have just turn the other cheek, and got the hell out of there.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.122 seconds