Is there any truth in the conspiracy about Gerrard and Liverpool.............................:S

Now that they are 4 games away from lifting the EPL Trophy, is there a subtle consensus by officials & officialdom to give the England captain & Liverpool F.C. captain his 1st PL medal.

Yesterday's clash with Man City saw the referee overlook 3 incidents at least, which could have had a major impact on the result.

There are some who reflect on the 3 penalties awarded against Man United also so a word of caution to fellow title-contenders Chelsea, be very afraid of the match officials when visiting Anfield.

Let's hope some sanity prevails.:S

VIVA Liverpool VIVA supporter for life.

This is not affecting his performance or integrity one presumes.............................:S

STORY....................................... www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2530600...treet-fight-row.html

More controversial stories

Here............................... www.football365.com/mailbox/9265785/Mails

If you want to go further

25 years anniversary of Hillsbourgh

Time to bring a huge smile back to Liverpool

chicken 'n chips Wrote:

---

> If you want to go further
>
> 25 years anniversary of Hillsbourgh
>
> Time to bring a huge smile back to Liverpool


PS Liverpool should have had a further two stone wall penalties in that match v Man United.

chicken 'n chips Wrote:

---

> If you want to go further
>
> 25 years anniversary of Hillsbourgh
>
> Time to bring a huge smile back to Liverpool

Yep and motivate Gerrard to lead England to victory in the World Cup.<

I wonder what will happen when Saurez dives in the penalty box against England. Will Gerrard still be his buddy then? England have virtually no chance of winning the WC. Italy and Uruguay should both beat them and Costa Rica will be no push over either.

The hand of Saurez dealt Africa a knockout blow in World Cup 2010 when Ghana were denied a certainty goal to proceed into the next round and Saurez standing at the goal-line stopped the ball with his hands.

Matt Stanger writes for football 365.com and comments................................

QUOTE

" City should have had a penalty when Skrtel punched the ball clear in the closing stages, but the replays showed that Mark Clattenburg wasn't in the best position to see the defender's handball.

The same excuse could not be offered to the referee in the first half , however, when Mamadhou Sakho took Dzeko out with a swing that would have been more appropriate at the Masters. The incident came just 7 minutes after Liverpool had scored their 2nd and had Clattenburg rightly awarded a spot-kick, the complexion of the game would have changed entirely.

There is also a case to be made that the referee should have shown Suarez a second yellow card for a dive. If the Uruguayan's theatrics had occurred in the box to try and win a penalty, he would surely have been booked, so why was he allowed to escape when throwing himself to the ground outside the area.? "

UNQUOTE.

Mike the team plays attacking football
They have scored 93 goals so far this season
Yes they have had some decisions go their way
But they have also been unlucky at Chelsea
When Eto tackles saurez of the ball in the box
Then at city earlier in the season perfectly good goal called offside

ya all haters on lfc at the moment
wen decisions were going the other way of lfc no1 picks that up.
LFC FOR LIFE!
<

haters they gonna hate.
players we gonna play.