Clairwood 12/6/2013

hibernia Wrote:

---

> Whats the PEN? is there any Juice in the ground?


21

Well done in 1st greg. Hope u are right about BS as dutch doubled Pullars in first 2 races (did the 2 biggies in the 2nd leaving randolphs out but see this is well shortish now so probably have to have saver on it ). Mugadlwa & Dillon both got decent stats for Pullar but cant find much for Randolph/Pullar:S

So there you have it. Puller was quick to say that Risky and the one with the long name will need it but the bright shining one was working better than the filly.

Either he knows jack all or he was deliberately trying to mislead the public.

Which one do you guys think it may be?

ooops. than we had quite a few winners!!


Tommy_Hotspur Wrote:

---

> Even though he looked very green and immature
> still, whatever beats Pimpernel wins.

knavesmire Wrote:

---

> Well done in 1st greg. Hope u are right about BS
> as dutch doubled Pullars in first 2 races (did the
> 2 biggies in the 2nd leaving randolphs out but see
> this is well shortish now so probably have to have
> saver on it ). Mugadlwa & Dillon both got decent
> stats for Pullar but cant find much for
> Randolph/Pullar:S

You were spot on, the wool was a puller over our eyes....()

shrek Wrote:

---

> Dream Away to improve on debut will play a small
> bet on 4/1 a place.


(tu)

keep cool, he said, that he is just hoping, because in this one run on the gras he "beat" risky. tjhat does not mean too much.
the win of risky was lucky enough. could u imagin he would have said: risky is ready for win and then just got touched on the line? wouldnT u have said, that he was still green and trainer should know?

Tommy_Hotspur Wrote:

---

> So there you have it. Puller was quick to say that
> Risky and the one with the long name will need it
> but the bright shining one was working better than
> the filly.
>
> Either he knows jack all or he was deliberately
> trying to mislead the public.
>
> Which one do you guys think it may be?

Mad about missing the double but managed to get 12s as single for Randolphs. Note of interest once again first 4 race observation up.

saldiani Wrote:

---

> keep cool, he said, that he is just hoping,
> because in this one run on the gras he "beat"
> risky. tjhat does not mean too much.
> the win of risky was lucky enough. could u imagin
> he would have said: risky is ready for win and
> then just got touched on the line? wouldnT u have
> said, that he was still green and trainer should
> know?
>
> Tommy_Hotspur Wrote:
>

---

>

---

> > So there you have it. Puller was quick to say
> that
> > Risky and the one with the long name will need
> it
> > but the bright shining one was working better
> than
> > the filly.
> >
> > Either he knows jack all or he was deliberately
> > trying to mislead the public.
> >
> > Which one do you guys think it may be?


Jeez Louis you complain about getting smithed and greefed and whatever else, now you want to tell me what I should or shouldn't know......yo,yo,yo you want your pie and eat it!

So a little bit of info that Garth decided to leave out was that Risky was better than the one who beat the filly.....

Selective memory or selective release of information

Good luck to the stable.

can sombody confirm what is official result of race no 2

hey tommy, i myself put a few euro on bright shining in hope. but i heard, that the trainer himself was not too confident. he put randolph on the other and so on...

i only complained several times about being "smithed", but never accused smith himself. although there were some really doubtfull races. but i know how strange behave this average horses... but admit, there were times, when we got smithed three times a day, u cannot compare this with puller