Why must I give you tips? What do I get out of it?

Hi

Retracted, not appropiate to the orinal thread.

fyi ruby is not Julie

hibernia Wrote:

---

> fyi ruby is not Julie

Thanks Hibernia. I did not say Julie was RC, only thought so but deffinately from the Alexander stable, so the same team.

She has posted on here in the hope that people stop bugging her. The heading of the thread should actually not be taken at face value. Perhaps now is the time to ask her a few times a day for some tips <

Miss Ruby, you clearly have no idea...........and PS - i am right and you are wrong! Hope u are able to handle that, cos to me it seems like you always like to be right (or you might think you right)

Happy days and good luck to your employers' yard

Last week tuesday paul peter went to julie and said tell the public donnie brasco is very well and will win, on thursday his son told julie southern taste is very well and will win and she must tell the public! How that for transparency ?

bad company Wrote:

---

> Last week tuesday paul peter went to julie and
> said tell the public donnie brasco is very well
> and will win, on thursday his son told julie
> southern taste is very well and will win and she
> must tell the public! How that for transparency ?


a double thumbs up(tu)(tu)

hi whos this tipster of note?
rubyclipper???????
if 'rubyclipper' wants to feel important please stand outside the course with a board saying
"no sense of humour"
"no friends on abc"
"no tips"

If they got a twitter account follow...
one of us clansmen should follow, and "re-tweet" it onto ABC, with the blessings of the yard of course?

Surely this should solve the problems...

However, I must agree on the fit and well debate, I see there are some favourites that have been laid off for over 200+ days, lets see how they run...

Wouter Wrote:

---

> If they got a twitter account follow...
> one of us clansmen should follow, and "re-tweet"
> it onto ABC, with the blessings of the yard of
> course?
>
> Surely this should solve the problems...
>
> However, I must agree on the fit and well debate,
> I see there are some favourites that have been
> laid off for over 200+ days, lets see how they
> run...

I did that Wouter, go see the Big T thread...

Wouter Wrote:

---

> If they got a twitter account follow...
> one of us clansmen should follow, and "re-tweet"
> it onto ABC, with the blessings of the yard of
> course?
>
> Surely this should solve the problems...
>
> However, I must agree on the fit and well debate,
> I see there are some favourites that have been
> laid off for over 200+ days, lets see how they
> run...


Why would you need blessings from the yard if they tweet it to the world?

@fogwills.

JAPAN.

trainers, jocks and presenters shouldn't be giving tips. On principle. Punters should be making their own deductment from available information - or rely on an 'agent' to do so on their behalf - bookie or tipster, at their own peril. Herein lies the problem. Is 'available information' trustworthy, reliable and readily available. No, not enough.

Had an interesting conversation on the weekend wherein the question was posed that, if information (totally transparent i.e. trials, chip in bum reports etc etc) were made available, the punter would lose out on the closing price of certain horses, i.e. the punter's market would lose out on the 50/1's etc.

However, pitched against this is the economies of scale theory whereby with transparent systems with flow of trustworthy information to the market, we would have MORE punters, ultimately raising the pools (and all that spinns off herefrom i.e. prize money). Punters would still have to do their homework on the few remaining probabilities that are not measurable i.e. what happens in the race on that day, how a horse responds to the particular course/weather/going etc. Which would equal out back to debated question of the flattening out of long odds.

opinion?