Vaal Vaal Vaal Thursday

CATALONIA is one i'm watching (expecting a good run)

Englander Wrote:

---

> Jolly Wood

I am one to blow my own bubble <

X(

X(Englander Wrote:

---

> Jolly Wood

Magi Wrote:

---

> JustinV Wrote:
>

---

>

---

> > Magi Wrote:
> >
>

---

>
> >

---

> > > JustinV Wrote:
> > >
> >
>

---

>
> >
> > >

---

> > > > handicapper's right again (tu)
> > >
> > >
> > > and next time they meet on grass 90% of the
> > > punters will look at the form, and the
> weights
> > > (where Kentcuky will be receiving only 2 or 3
> > > kg's) and say that Mythical a 'good thing' at
> > the
> > > weights :S ...based on todays run.
> >
> >
> > cant speak what other punters will see but on
> this
> > run mythical palace will go up on turf as well
> and
> > kentucky sheik will still be the same on
> turf..so
> > k sheik will be even better off with mythical
> > palace, on turf
>
> At the risk of getting a lecture {friendly wave to
> Jack Dash}... Why would his MR go up on grass ??


because the horse doesnt have two seperate ratings..it is 'one' horse..it ran off an 85 today..last time it ran on sand off 76..today it ran off an 85,without perfroming on the surface ..it went up on grass so it therefore also went up on sand..same should happen again..

englander, saw your comment only now.

azzie said this today. i think, we should appreciate every comment, even if false. we can write it in our notebook or not.

there were only two points of interests for me

1) who backed this horse, if the trainer thinks, he would be shocked? which information did he have? from where?

2) was there a neccessarity to use such strong words? i mean, if we want comments, that does not mean, we want to be disleaded. or to say it in another way WE DON'T WANT PROGNOSES, we just want a comment on how they "run" at home, nothing more.

3) that lead to the conclusion, that more transparency is needed, than we do not have to talk about persons any more.

saldiani Wrote:

---

> englander, saw your comment only now.
>
> azzie said this today. i think, we should
> appreciate every comment, even if false. we can
> write it in our notebook or not.
>
> there were only two points of interests for me
>
> 1) who backed this horse, if the trainer thinks,
> he would be shocked? which information did he
> have? from where?
>
> 2) was there a neccessarity to use such strong
> words? i mean, if we want comments, that does not
> mean, we want to be disleaded. or to say it in
> another way WE DON'T WANT PROGNOSES, we just want
> a comment on how they "run" at home, nothing
> more.
>
> 3) that lead to the conclusion, that more
> transparency is needed, than we do not have to
> talk about persons any more.

Hello S What time did you hear the comments bud? and were they direct from Azzie or passed on by a tv commentator?

hi englander

i did not want to ivestigate against mr azzie!

one of the commentators said, he was not too confident. then the other commentator said, "in fact he did say, that he would be shocked, if the horse wins, that were his words". i think we can trust the commentator, because after the race, he asked azzie: you were not too confident and azzie did not deny this.

the rest is said (and sad?)


> Hello S What time did you hear the comments
> bud? and were they direct from Azzie or passed on
> by a tv commentator?

mr goosen also walked past and said olympic bird will run in the first 4..it was then slow away and never in it..trainers should be commended for their honesty not slated..i somehow dont think mr azz was walking past and said ooh i know lets decieve the public so i can get a price and tell them it cant win!! :)o