Vaal Vaal Vaal Thursday

Hazelwood for the second

Lucky Strike Wrote:

---

> Fark sorry clan I missed the race and lost track
> of time only saw now the race was already run when
> I posted lol


Lol !!!! Don't worry bud, can happen to anyone.

<

4x1x5x7

Callatus Wrote:

---

> Lucky Strike Wrote:
>

---

>

---

> > Fark sorry clan I missed the race and lost
> track
> > of time only saw now the race was already run
> when
> > I posted lol
>
>
> Lol !!!! Don't worry bud, can happen to anyone.
>
> <

Don't be so so nice Callatus... I'm tempted to ask him he wants a "Life President" position in the "idiots" ... <

oops, mistake

saldiani Wrote:

---

> lucky, i must be again against you.. sorry, ... he
> showed absolutely nothing. how can a horse, who
> has shown nothing be known to show something not
> this time but next? HOW CAN ONE PREDICT AN
> IMPROVEMENT???
>
> but i am with you on marius!
>
> --Lucky Strike Wrote:
>

---

>

---

> > Good if Fradd is not riding I will be having a
> > good ew bet on Zogs. Englander if he doesn't
> win
> > today it will be in his next start. Heard it
> > through the grapevine from a reliable source

Englander Wrote:

---

> Callatus Wrote:
>

---

>

---

> > Lucky Strike Wrote:
> >
>

---

>
> >

---

> > > Fark sorry clan I missed the race and lost
> > track
> > > of time only saw now the race was already run
> > when
> > > I posted lol
> >
> >
> > Lol !!!! Don't worry bud, can happen to
> anyone.
> >
> > <
>
> Don't be so so nice Callatus... I'm tempted to ask
> him he wants a "Life President" position in the
> "idiots" ... <


Bwa ha ha ha ha ! (tu)(tu)

Lucky strike i dunno what your source has been saying but mr zogs is a hound

mr azzie: "would be shocked if he wins"

was heavily backed. owner? if the trainer says, that he would be shocked? debutant?
i don't say, every trainer has to give right prognoses. but i ask myself, how can a trainer say about agood horse, that is backed, he would be shocked"
my problem is not the wrong prognose, my problem is that he did not say: he is very good, but first time on the sand he probably need the run"
may be he thought, will win, but did not want to have to high expectations. anyway this gives us a bad taste.

yes, trainers, owners, please give us concrete signs. but personally i would not use words like "shocked about a debutant.
anyway it is to us to learn and remember (so this is no complaint, just something for the notebook)

saldiani Wrote:

---

> mr azzie: "would be shocked if he wins"
>
> was heavily backed. owner? if the trainer says,
> that he would be shocked? debutant?
> i don't say, every trainer has to give right
> prognoses. but i ask myself, how can a trainer say
> about agood horse, that is backed, he would be
> shocked"
> my problem is not the wrong prognose, my problem
> is that he did not say: he is very good, but first
> time on the sand he probably need the run"
> may be he thought, will win, but did not want to
> have to high expectations. anyway this gives us a
> bad taste.
>
> yes, trainers, owners, please give us concrete
> signs. but personally i would not use words like
> "shocked about a debutant.
> anyway it is to us to learn and remember (so this
> is no complaint, just something for the notebook)


Agree (tu)

i mean, who can back a debutant, if not someone, who knows somethin by the trainer or jockey? so how can they be shocked.
i am not talkin about "prognoses", just would like to know, who knew what?
the problem is not too much "transparency", which leads to complaints about wrong prognoses, but NOT ENOUGH transparency.

if every trainer would publish each time on his webside like bass and others, it would be no problem. because you could just assess their comments.

did anyone ever hear a bad word about mike basses comments? no. that is the clue. MORE transparency.

Can Mexican Glory win in race 3 ?