Feature Races - Media Coverage

I was being sarcastic... Sorry for getting your hopes up Homer....

That lot on Tabonline are the biggest yokes in racing, calling themselves racing journalists.... (td)

Homer Wrote:

---

> Shrek - I would love to think my horses will do
> well, but in my book the horse to beat is
> Greenacre. I also think Lord Jonathan is a big
> runner! Le Var priced wrong by the bookies (they
> think Cape horses are always the ones to beat) and
> should have been much shorter. He is a big runner
> - not saying he will win (he is even better than
> his last win) but will be in the first 4. Sedge
> has been gelded and this race has come a bit too
> quick for him. Having said that his work has been
> very very good and may surprise!

Homer I hope you got the lot see it was 28/1 on interbet well doneX(

James - told you yetesday (sorry whiskey is talking now) yesterday that Le Var was priced wrong. When Delpech got off him last win he said this horse will go places and he won quite well. I cannot believe a maiden was priced up as short as it was. These maidens get rolled everytime in PE Features....Should not be allowed anyway to run in Features IMO....

HOMER WHY SHOULdnt maidens be allowed to run in features?

Pirates I just think a horse should first show it has potential to race in a Feature - winning a maiden at least! You do not see maidens in the July or Met so why should other Features be different. Does not matter whether it raced against a so called top class sort!

homers maidens have won english classics ..,kings temptress won the nursery 2 weeks ago at turfontein as an UNRACED MAIDEN....i could quote many many more...a horses ability HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH HOW MANY RACES IT HAS WON

Then they all must run at level weights - especially 2 year olds