MOD get the nod
- LSU
-
- Premium Member
-
- Posts: 568
- Thanks: 145
Re: MOD get the nod
4 years 9 months ago
No wonder no one takes this forum as serious as they should as we can never see the positives in anything. The negatives nearly always dominate in each thread and this new chapter have not even started and the bandwagon is pumping already.
Surely the RA's duty is to look at owners interests and never before has this been more important than right now in aiding in determining a new vision and structure for racing.
At the moment the business rescue practitioner is in charge of decisions and not those leading the MOD bid. They are however acting in the interest of racing and its stakeholders and should be commended for doing this without compensation.
Once a new structure is in place it is clear that they could not possibly serve on both sides but this should not present a conflict in what is an advisory capacity at this point. If it is clear that their involvement is self serving then shout from the roof tops but i have seen nothing to suggest that their involvement is not for the greater good of the sport.
Lets give these guys the benefit of the doubt as the last thing we need is division before the potential new era has even started.
Surely the RA's duty is to look at owners interests and never before has this been more important than right now in aiding in determining a new vision and structure for racing.
At the moment the business rescue practitioner is in charge of decisions and not those leading the MOD bid. They are however acting in the interest of racing and its stakeholders and should be commended for doing this without compensation.
Once a new structure is in place it is clear that they could not possibly serve on both sides but this should not present a conflict in what is an advisory capacity at this point. If it is clear that their involvement is self serving then shout from the roof tops but i have seen nothing to suggest that their involvement is not for the greater good of the sport.
Lets give these guys the benefit of the doubt as the last thing we need is division before the potential new era has even started.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Pirhobeta
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 24807
- Thanks: 1606
Re: MOD get the nod
4 years 9 months ago
those who don't take this forum seriously have also come and gone...:ohmy:
but I'm just commenting...
but I'm just commenting...
The following user(s) said Thank You: LSU
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- LSU
-
- Premium Member
-
- Posts: 568
- Thanks: 145
Re: MOD get the nod
4 years 9 months ago
We moaned them to death so I guess you are right P. Hard to argue with that point but we could be so much more of an influential voice if we have a more balanced view.


The following user(s) said Thank You: Pirhobeta
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Pirhobeta
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 24807
- Thanks: 1606
Re: MOD get the nod
4 years 9 months ago
I'm so glad that you read it the way it was intended, LSU...
I definitely don't want to offend anyone...

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Bob Brogan
-
Topic Author
- Administrator
-
- Posts: 82524
- Thanks: 6461
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Pirhobeta
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 24807
- Thanks: 1606
Re: MOD get the nod
4 years 9 months agoBob Brogan wrote: Having more than one point of view is balanced!


Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Muhtiman
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 8933
- Thanks: 1014
Re: MOD get the nod
4 years 9 months ago
....I'd rather have this..... than the thought of someone like Duppie or Brugman at the head of an outside invasion..:blink:
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.105 seconds