Queen Supreme - Lay Or Play
- Bob Brogan
-
Topic Author
- Administrator
-
- Posts: 82474
- Thanks: 6449
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Deeno
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 8174
- Thanks: 483
Re: Queen Supreme - Lay Or Play
5 years 4 months ago
A player for sure.
Someone, in the know, told me before the last race that QS was a division or two better than the field it met the last time. Prepared to take my chances on that basis.
Someone, in the know, told me before the last race that QS was a division or two better than the field it met the last time. Prepared to take my chances on that basis.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Mac
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 12013
- Thanks: 940
Re: Re:Queen Supreme - Lay Or Play
5 years 4 months ago
Queen Supreme and Celtic Sea are the only runners in the Majorca.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- rolands song
-
- Elite Member
-
- Posts: 1657
- Thanks: 148
Re: Queen Supreme - Lay Or Play
5 years 4 months ago
Banker of the year..should start 8-10 and win by 3lenghts
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- bayern
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 11808
- Thanks: 2611
Re: Queen Supreme - Lay Or Play
5 years 4 months ago
What odds are the layers prepared to give
Guessing has never been widely acclaimed as a good gambling strategy.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- BATMAN
-
- Elite Member
-
- Posts: 1379
- Thanks: 195
Re: Queen Supreme - Lay Or Play
5 years 4 months ago
I really believe that if she ran in the met over 2000 she could win.However dropping back to the 1600 m on her second cpt start taking on Celtic sea who is having her 3 rd run here and seems to be better then she has been before.The way she impressed last time and 1600 is also her distance. I will go for Celtic sea.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- bayern
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 11808
- Thanks: 2611
Re: Queen Supreme - Lay Or Play
5 years 4 months agoBATMAN wrote: I really believe that if she ran in the met over 2000 she could win.However dropping back to the 1600 m on her second cpt start taking on Celtic sea who is having her 3 rd run here and seems to be better then she has been before.The way she impressed last time and 1600 is also her distance. I will go for Celtic sea.
Celtic Sea has run 1600m 5 times and won once. Queen Supreme has run the distance twice and won twice. Not like she is seeing the course for the first time either. To be honest, Celtic Sea’s merit rating is what it is not because of what she achieved over 1600m races, let’s not kid ourselves.
Guessing has never been widely acclaimed as a good gambling strategy.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Frodo
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 13126
- Thanks: 3032
Re: Queen Supreme - Lay Or Play
5 years 4 months ago
Play, play, play - should have been in the Met imo - but I suppose this is easier pickings - Celtic Sea's only win over the distance was when beating Oh Susanna, who imo has never been more than around 110 (ok that's 120 nowadays) - and she was comfortably beaten by Front and Centre - who was firmly put in her place by QS - I agree QS will start at odds-on - if her prep has gone to plan - if she drifts, it might be a cause for concern - 2nd run after a bit of a break, etc
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Craig Pienaar
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 8871
- Thanks: 2573
Re: Queen Supreme - Lay Or Play
5 years 4 months ago
For me will be lucky to run top 4 , Celtic Sea and Clouds Unfold will fight it out , Front And Centre for 3rd and maybe Queen for back end of quartets
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Saint Tropez
-
- Premium Member
-
- Posts: 833
- Thanks: 93
Re: Queen Supreme - Lay Or Play
5 years 4 months ago
Front And Centre to run a much better race come Saturday, my first choice
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.128 seconds