Kenilworth Tuesday

Add Fort Agopian in your quartets, should run an improved race.

Bronzed win

Ven KEN RC 2 1,10/1,7/8/1/5-7/6/9

KEN PIC 6:
KEN RC 3 P6 1-3,5,7/1-8/1/1,2,5-7,9/6/4,6,7,9

Elusiva silva win

Double Dividends Race 5 Paying
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
1 98.4 36.6 SCR 332 33.0 57.0 43.8 SCR 124
2 SCR SCR SCR SCR SCR SCR SCR SCR SCR
3 SCR SCR SCR SCR SCR SCR SCR SCR SCR
4 206 169 SCR 959 144 279 132 SCR 434
5 363 247 SCR 669 247 355 237 SCR 397
6 256 198 SCR 729 182 153 174 SCR 390
7 486 307 SCR 746 252 396 227 SCR 520

In race 5, the 1 Mirage was 6/10 yet the double into race 6 would have paid R33 with the 5 (9/2 in to 5/2)...seems too high...+-9/1 fixed odds double paying 3 times that on tote...

Anyone else think this another strange dividend?...an almost daily occurrence...

I think you need to divide the dividends by 6.
R6 gets you one unit.

kreezy wrote: Elusive silva win

Bomb R27.40 a win :woohoo: :woohoo:

durbs wrote: I think you need to divide the dividends by 6.
R6 gets you one unit.

I humbly ask why it is R6 for 1 unit...has always been R1 / unit, to my knowledge...if I take one horse in leg 1 and one horse in leg 2, my minimum R6 bet gives me 6 units ie. R1/unit...

I might be way off the mark, but I guess this change is basically to try lead people into believing their payout is larger than normal, when infact it should work to exactly the same. Could also be a advert for "bigger" payouts when co mingled (even though they are not).... I can't think of why else....

What was the previous minimum wager on a double? Was it R6?

Lasata win