Is Wiese for real?

  • whoah
  • Topic Author
  • Senior Member
  • Senior Member
  • Posts: 112
  • Thanks: 4

Is Wiese for real?

11 years 4 weeks ago
#476239
One minute he says the poly is bad and now he`s saying sorry,(see the sporting post article}

and remember he had the big mouth first after his horse won the week before ,Agrella had the accident the following week.

he`s gave up boxes to Kotzen and Bremner, this must be business first?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Bob Brogan
  • Administrator
  • Administrator
  • Posts: 82482
  • Thanks: 6449

Re: Re: Is Wiese for real?

11 years 4 weeks ago
#476241

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Bob Brogan
  • Administrator
  • Administrator
  • Posts: 82482
  • Thanks: 6449

Re: Re: Is Wiese for real?

11 years 3 weeks ago
#476672
RELEASED BY: Phumelela Gaming and Leisure Limited

Fairview Racecourse’s Polytrack is well along the path to its first
anniversary and to date the synthetic surface has matched all expectations.
Installation of the surface was completed last September and the track was
then opened for training purposes.
The first two races on Polytrack took place on the opening day of the Algoa
Cup Festival on Friday 25 October with the first full race meeting only
scheduled for a few weeks later. But heavy rain on the Saturday forced a
change of plans and the entire meeting on Sunday 27 October, including the
Algoa Cup, had to be switched from turf to Polytrack to save the fixture.
The meeting went off smoothly and compliments flowed freely from riders
afterwards. Jockey Greg Cheyne said: “It was absolutely fantastic. The
horses held their ground nicely and no one was slipping around the turn. It
may look tight, but it is as good as any Polytrack anywhere in the world.”
Since then the Polytrack has saved another four turf race meetings from
being lost due to rain and Phumelela Horseracing Executive Patrick Davis
said to date the surface had delivered what was envisaged when it was
installed.
“Polytrack’s ability to significantly reduce the number of meetings lost
due to inclement weather and the resultant loss of income to horsemen,
while simultaneously providing a sound racing surface, was one of the
primary reasons for installing it in the first instance. Also, it does not
require copious amounts of water, a key factor in an area where water
shortages are commonplace,” Davis said.
“Predictably, there have been teething problems and trainers, jockeys and
the track management team have all gone through a steep learning curve.
Fortunately, champion trainer Mike de Kock agreed to share his insights
into synthetic surfaces with horsemen in Port Elizabeth before we opened
the track and that was invaluable.
“As was said at the outset, Polytrack is not a wonder surface and De Kock
warned that certain horses should be kept well away from training or racing
on the track. And like any racing surface, Polytrack is impacted by the
weather with the surface tighter and faster when it’s cool, and looser and
slower in warm weather. In very hot temperatures, we found that the track
became too loose and generated excessive kickback, but that seems to have
been resolved by watering when necessary,” Davis continued.
He added that as always the safety of horses and riders on the surface is
an ongoing major concern and to that end complaints about the track were
investigated and statistics of fatal breakdowns both in work and races are
maintained and monitored.
“As Martin Collins, the inventor of Polytrack, has pointed out, trainers
and horses have differing requirements from the surface, so it’s impossible
to keep everybody happy. But in maintaining and preparing the surface,
track staff strive for safety and to satisfy the majority of trainers.”
To 12 May there have been 1,929 runners on the Polytrack and on average
about 2,500 horses train on it every month. There have been three fatal
breakdowns - one in training and two in races (0.104%). There have been six
fatalities on turf at Fairview in the same period - two in races and four
in work.
Claims that kickback from the Polytrack was causing coughing were
investigated by course veterinarian Charles Hayward. He scoped 13 horses,
selecting those with one or more symptoms of fatigue, respiratory distress
and facial kickback or making abnormal respiratory sounds or coughing.
He found that all 13 horses had dirt in their nasal passages, seven were
completely clean in the trachea, six were bleeders, two had dirt in the
pharynx and only one had singular grains of sand in the trachea.
He concluded that nasal contamination did pose a small problem, but
haemorrhaging rather than particle contamination, was the cause of coughing
and not the Polytrack.
Some of the Fairview synthetic track’s detractors have referred to
Keeneland Racecourse in the USA deciding to lift its Polytrack and revert
to dirt racing from Autumn this year as proof of the surface’s
shortcomings.
The reality is that Keeneland’s decision has little to do with the
capabilities of Polytrack and much more to do with the end of the USA’s
brief flirtation with synthetic surfaces.
A few years back it seemed that many dirt tracks in the USA were set to be
replaced by synthetic surfaces. But in a land where dirt racing is king, a
wholesale switch to synthetic surfaces became unviable once it emerged that
many more turf horses were effective on synthetic tracks than dirt horses.
That, in turn, has left USA racecourses with synthetic surfaces little
option but to revert to dirt if they wish to attract the leading lights of
American horseracing because the majority of owners and trainers favour
dirt racing.
For the record, over the past five years the Keeneland Polytrack had 11
fatalities in 11,367 starts - less than one death (0.97) for every 1,000
starters. The figure for all synthetic surfaces in the USA during the same
period was 1.22, significantly lower than the 2.08 fatalities per 1,000
starters on dirt and the 1.63 on turf.
“There’s no doubt Polytrack is a proven alternative surface to turf, but as
with all racing surfaces the key to the continued success of the Fairview
Polytrack will lie in the maintenance of the surface and trainers using the
track responsibly,” Davis concluded.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • rob faux
  • New Member
  • New Member
  • Thanks: 0

Re: Re: Is Wiese for real?

11 years 3 weeks ago
#476847
He said he is sorry for approaching the media.................he has not withdrawn his opinion!!

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • naresh
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 6385
  • Thanks: 1497

Re: Re: Is Wiese for real?

11 years 3 weeks ago
#476964
Synthetic racetrack surfaces for horse racing
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A synthetic racetrack surface is a kind of surface substance that replaces grass, dirt or sand as the racing surface on a horse racing track. Manufacturers of synthetic racetrack surface materials promote the fact that synthetic tracks have drainage attributes that are better than natural surfaces. In other situations such as cold weather, these surfaces allow racing to be continued when it might otherwise be cancelled.

Synthetic tracks are also used in large horse-training centres to allow trainers to train their horses even in inclement weather conditions.



2 Current types of synthetic surface products
2.1 Cushion Track
2.2 Fibresand
2.3 Polytrack
2.4 Pro-Ride
2.5 Tapeta
2.6 Visco-Ride

History[edit]
The first synthetic surface used for thoroughbred racing was Tropical Park's Tartan turf, a synthetic surface similar to Astroturf installed in 1966. Tartan turf was never a success with horsemen.[1]

The first synthetic surface to replace dirt in the United States was installed at The Meadows Racetrack and Casino in Washington, PA in 1963. This surface, called Tartan, was found to be unsatisfactory and removed and replaced with a traditional limestone surface in 1975.

Current types of synthetic surface products[edit]
(In alphabetical order)

Cushion Track[edit]
Installer: Equestrian Surfaces

Origin: United Kingdom

Description of surface: Sand, synthetic fibers, elastic fiber, and granulated rubber coated with wax. The footing is approximately nine inches deep, followed by a geotextile membrane.[2]

Installations: Santa Anita Park (removed), Betfair Hollywood Park (now closed) & Toowoomba QLD.Toowoomba has subsequently removed the cushion track and replaced it with a StrathAyre grass track due to considerable performance issues.

Fibresand[edit]
Installer: Mansfield Sand Company

Origin: United Kingdom

Description of surface: Sand particles and polypropylene fibres.[3]

Installations: Southwell Racecourse[4]

Polytrack[edit]
Installer: Martin Collins Enterprises


Origin: United Kingdom

Description of surface: A mixture of silica sand, recycled synthetic fibers (carpet & spandex) and recycled rubber/pvc. In cold climates, the mixture may also include jelly cable (plastic insulation from copper phone wire). The entire mixture is coated with wax.

Installations: Lingfield Park, Wolverhampton, Kempton Park, Great Leighs, Dundalk, Chantilly, Marseille-Vivaux, Pau (CLOPF), Kranji, Mijas(CLOPF), Veliefendi, Turfway Park, Woodbine, Arlington Park, Del Mar Racetrack, Keeneland Race Course & Greyville, Durban South Africa.

Pro-Ride[edit]
Installer: Pro-Ride Racing Australia Pty Ltd


Origin: Australia

Description of surface: 6 Inches of footing (Sand, Nylon fibres, Spandex fibres coated in a Polymeric Binder) on top of a 4 inch IMC Layer (Sand & Nylon fibres) on top of a drainage system.[5]

Installations: Flemington Racecourse VIC, Santa Anita (removed), Rosehill Racecourse NSW & Warwick Farm Racecourse NSW.[6]

Tapeta[edit]
Installer: Michael Dickinson, Inc.


Origin: USA

Description of surface: Sand, fibre, rubber and wax makes up the top 4-7 inches of the racing surface, followed by either porous asphalt or a geotextile membrane.[7]

Installations: Golden Gate Fields, Presque Isle Downs and Meydan Racecourse.

Visco-Ride[edit]
Origin: Australia


Description of surface: Sand and fibre coated in Wax.

Installations: Flemington VIC (removed) Cranbourne VIC (removed) and Warwick Farm NSW (removed).

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • naresh
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 6385
  • Thanks: 1497

Re: Re: Is Wiese for real?

11 years 3 weeks ago
#476965
Many of these synthetic surface racetracks have been removed. I wonder why :S

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.112 seconds