hollywood fixed place prices

Hey guys, is it me or has hollywood fixed place betting odds decreased dramatically. I remember this time last year, they were rather competitive but comparing them to interbet now and there's a huge difference even when both offer 4 places (16 runners) Hollywood's odds are significant lower.

smashley Wrote:

---

> Hey guys, is it me or has hollywood fixed place
> betting odds decreased dramatically. I remember
> this time last year, they were rather competitive
> but comparing them to interbet now and there's a
> huge difference even when both offer 4 places (16
> runners) Hollywood's odds are significant lower.


Interbet don`t offer 4 places on carded races when scratchings etc

smashley Wrote:

---

> Hey guys, is it me or has hollywood fixed place
> betting odds decreased dramatically. I remember
> this time last year, they were rather competitive
> but comparing them to interbet now and there's a
> huge difference even when both offer 4 places (16
> runners) Hollywood's odds are significant lower.

What race are you referring to?

As Bob mentioned, Hollywood offers 4 fixed odds places on races with 14 runners or more, regardless of how many scratchings there are. Therefore if there are only 10 or 11 runners from an original 14, you can expect them to be much lower due to the extra place being offered.

Also remember that ante-post prices will be different to race-time percentages where the betting is more competitive and stable.

You say this is a race where there was 16 runners?

I can look into the race and see if there was an error?

As always,quick to check and balance
Great to know we have you at Hollywood, Dev(tu)

Hi dev, no i have no errors regarding this thanks for asking. Just comparing an example of turfontein race : 3 today. Both hollywood and interbet are offering 4 fixed places on this race but intebets place odds are offering higher dividends, maybe i am just shopping around for value.

Dev, instead of being politically correct, why don't you read his comment properly. He said,
there's a
> huge difference even when both offer 4 places (16
> runners) Hollywood's odds are significant lower.

So your response about 10 - 11 runners, lost me. This post is not intended to be rude

hi smash ,remember the fees

hibernia Wrote:

---

> hi smash ,remember the fees


and the poor liquidity

True Hibernia, you have a point there

pirates Wrote:

---

> hibernia Wrote:
>

---

>

---

> > hi smash ,remember the fees
>
>
> and the poor liquidity


on a seperate issue....interbet as i understand it a mediator between bookies wanting to lay and punters wanting to back....but when u take multiples ...who actually stands this bet...

i have seen some horrendous rules regards place betting with some bookies.....for eg.....one bookie gives u a a price for a horse in a 14 horse field...but if theres 1 sctraching the price remains the same ...but u get only the first 3....same principal with regards to 8 horse field...only first 2 when there is a scratching

RACING GURU Wrote:

---

> pirates Wrote:
>

---

>

---

> > hibernia Wrote:
> >
>

---

>
> >

---

> > > hi smash ,remember the fees
> >
> >
> > and the poor liquidity
>
>
> on a seperate issue....interbet as i understand
> it a mediator between bookies wanting to lay and
> punters wanting to back....but when u take
> multiples ...who actually stands this bet...


the same bookies? the liquidity would have to be available to run the bet on?