Flamingo Park Monday 14/10/13

hibernia Wrote:

---

> E it's the only way I gamble , if a horse is not
> my price I won't punt, That price might be 1/5


Were you the teacher or student for Dave's punting method? The redder the better. . .

I really like Ice Kitten today but what a lousy price.

Who is DERBAAS

hibernia Wrote:

---

> E it's the only way I gamble , if a horse is not
> my price I won't punt, That price might be 1/5

Big risk for little profit gambling that way in SA imho Bob. And what do you do if you give three horses a chance in one race, not punt, do all three or the one with the shortest/biggest price?

Correct E that's why you punt when you see value in the price, you have to price your own fancies up.if you like one and make it a 2/1 shot and the bookies open 4/1 you have your life on ... That is value, just like if you make one 1/10 and there is 1/5 available that is value

extreme dream to be third again <

Chiovani has been claimed 5/2 into 16/10

Flamingo
R1 - FIVE RINGS 6/10 win best bet
R2 - PRINCESS ALBERTA 1/1 win
R3 - DESERT BREEZE 7/2 6/10 w/p
R4 - ILISABETTA 28/10 6/10 w/p
R5 - DREAMWALKER 5/1 19/20 w/p
R6 - CHIOVANNI 3/1 6/10 w/p
R7 - SHARK ATTACK 5/1 1/1 w/p
R8 - HERE I AM 22/10 4/10 w/p
R9 - MILKWOOD MANOR 8/1 19/10 w/
p

ziets where are you getting 3/1 Chiovanni?

I like Chiovanni as my best bet on the card.

RUSALKA OPERA in the 1st race currently 25/1 and is worth including in tri's and quart's

In SA Bob, I never make anything a 1/10 shot and is why I am always amazed how much chat there is on these threads about claimed first timers that are apparently all the rage... yesterday being a prime example. Fail, fail, fail to deliver. If you are like Agra and have little birds flying around "tweeting" and you get 10/1 then great, worth the chance but otherwise... leave them the fark alone ffs clanners!!! I've lost count of the number of de Kock good things in the last few months that just don't live up to the money, certainly first time out. Anyway, we all have different interpretations of value, as the other thread demonstrated. All I would add is mine is right and yours is so very wrong! lmao <