Jackson
- Bob Brogan
-
- Administrator
-
- Posts: 82513
- Thanks: 6460
Re: Re: Jackson
11 years 10 months ago
avanza Wrote:
> keniza999 Wrote:
>
>
> > Contest Wrote:
> >
>
>
> >
> > > keniza999 Wrote:
> > >
> >
>
>
> >
> > >
> > > > avanza Wrote:
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > Jackson is overrated.
> > > > > Stop smoking dube and face reality!
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > two wfa group 1s wins over 2000m as a 3yo
> > > > three placings in wfa gr2/3 over 1600m as
> a
> > > > 3/4yo
> > > >
> > > > can't be overrated....perhaps just badly
> > > handled
> > >
> > > They were 3yo races, not wfa
> >
> > correct but the weight factor was neutralised
> > anyway which makes them true test of ability...
>
> what ability? The proof is in the pudding. So far
> he is a flopped cake.
> Hope springs eternal.
> If he was any sort of a 'great' his record would
> be gleeming by now.
> I would love to see and witness a legend, but
> sadly I think Jackson is not a legend.prove me
> wrong Jackson, I would love to see you shine
There you go
> keniza999 Wrote:
>
>
> > Contest Wrote:
> >
>
>
> >
> > > keniza999 Wrote:
> > >
> >
>
>
> >
> > >
> > > > avanza Wrote:
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > Jackson is overrated.
> > > > > Stop smoking dube and face reality!
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > two wfa group 1s wins over 2000m as a 3yo
> > > > three placings in wfa gr2/3 over 1600m as
> a
> > > > 3/4yo
> > > >
> > > > can't be overrated....perhaps just badly
> > > handled
> > >
> > > They were 3yo races, not wfa
> >
> > correct but the weight factor was neutralised
> > anyway which makes them true test of ability...
>
> what ability? The proof is in the pudding. So far
> he is a flopped cake.
> Hope springs eternal.
> If he was any sort of a 'great' his record would
> be gleeming by now.
> I would love to see and witness a legend, but
> sadly I think Jackson is not a legend.prove me
> wrong Jackson, I would love to see you shine
There you go
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- mr hawaii
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 20065
- Thanks: 2653
Re: Re: Jackson
11 years 10 months ago
glad to see the guy back hope he stays sound and will be a top sire
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- rob faux
-
- New Member
-
- Thanks: 0
Re: Re: Jackson
11 years 10 months ago
The run of Jackson looked very good but a word of warning.........whenever the placed horses behind are unexpected, the form often doesn't stand up.......last year Jackson looked just as good in a similar race/result!!!!!
I would be happier if Whiteline Fever, Run For It etc. had run to their rating!
Needs to confirm before I am convinced!
I would be happier if Whiteline Fever, Run For It etc. had run to their rating!
Needs to confirm before I am convinced!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Guest
-
- Visitor
-
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- gregbucks
-
- New Member
-
- Thanks: 0
Re: Re: Jackson
11 years 10 months ago
Rob which horse(s) have consistently run to there rating this season in your opinion...??
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- flaunt
-
- Premium Member
-
- Posts: 881
- Thanks: 83
Re: Re: Jackson
11 years 10 months ago
No noise about the horse been stabled at drier? Perhaps the reason for the performance based on the season he is having?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- fogwils
-
- New Member
-
- Thanks: 0
Re: Re: Jackson
11 years 10 months ago
Morning
I did not back Jackson yesterday but IMO he ran a great Race yesterday AND IS BACK to his best.
If his physical and/or physcological problem has been sorted then he will win a lot more Group 1 races and I for one will now back him over distances from 1800m and up untill he gets beaten, if he gets beaten, especially as ALL our top Horses are/will get exported.
Go Jackson and lets some some money.
I did not back Jackson yesterday but IMO he ran a great Race yesterday AND IS BACK to his best.
If his physical and/or physcological problem has been sorted then he will win a lot more Group 1 races and I for one will now back him over distances from 1800m and up untill he gets beaten, if he gets beaten, especially as ALL our top Horses are/will get exported.
Go Jackson and lets some some money.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- easy
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 3853
- Thanks: 260
Re: Re: Jackson
11 years 10 months ago
@ fogwils
Let me understand what u saying, he is a top horse but only the top horse are getting exported and he is not getting exported.....lol
Let me understand what u saying, he is a top horse but only the top horse are getting exported and he is not getting exported.....lol
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Guest
-
- Visitor
-
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- rob faux
-
- New Member
-
- Thanks: 0
Re: Re: Jackson
11 years 10 months ago
gregbucks Wrote:
> Rob which horse(s) have consistently run to there
> rating this season in your opinion...??
Not too many Greg,and very few at the lower level or lesser centres!
> Rob which horse(s) have consistently run to there
> rating this season in your opinion...??
Not too many Greg,and very few at the lower level or lesser centres!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- zsuzsanna04
-
- New Member
-
- Thanks: 0
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Pirhobeta
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 24789
- Thanks: 1602
Re: Re: Jackson
11 years 10 months ago
zsuzsanna04 Wrote:
> @Ben-Hur - Fabiani retired after this year's Met.
are we not lucky to have our questions answered....(tu)
> @Ben-Hur - Fabiani retired after this year's Met.
are we not lucky to have our questions answered....(tu)
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.117 seconds