Assign the Assasin -Hold onto all tickets here

How come no inquiry called? Race Replay

I reckon that under the old objection rules he would have been a goner, but he was in no danger with the current rules. He surely cost the 4th horse at least one place, but not the win, which is how it would have to be today for him to lose the race.

Interfered with the 2nd aswell?

Cost me the swinger...:X

15-Dec-2011 411362 VAAL Race 1 4 8/ 4 8/ Swinger 100.00 Lose

I don't think he cost the 2nd horse very much.

I'm a punter Lips, have a bit of sympathy...

gregbucks Wrote:

---

> I'm a punter Lips, have a bit of sympathy...

And I'm not a Stipe. I can sympathise all day long, but the result's not going to change.<

Hahaha... that's true(tu)

magiclips Wrote:

---

> gregbucks Wrote:
>

---

>

---

> > I'm a punter Lips, have a bit of sympathy...
>
> And I'm not a Stipe. I can sympathise all day
> long, but the result's not going to change.<


I reckon it should,i have had horses flung out in SA for looking at another horse.

Magic,are you certain.?....my understanding is that the horse interfered with must,but for the interference,have BEATEN THE OFFENDER,and the offender would then be placed behind the offended......if something else happens to gain.....so be it!
I thought that,in this case, the winner would be placed behind the 4th horse therefore promoting it to third,and the 2nd and 3rd similarly,benefit.(my belief being that the 4th would have beaten the winner)
I think the lack of action was due to the nature of the race ie.amateur workriders and the offender was a first ride.
(BTW I don't agree with the sentiment cos the punting is the same)

(BTW, I had laid the 2nd horse so I am selfishly happy with the outcome)

Cashed my winning ticket already:D

I am 100% with Rob. The fact that we never even had a race review is beyond me. I am not suggesting Ali Cohen is a stipe but he too saw it and seemed convinced the hooter would sound.