Vaal Sand Tuesday

  • 2cents
  • New Member
  • New Member
  • Thanks: 0

Re: Re: Vaal Sand Tuesday

13 years 8 months ago
#159225
LL I was just revving you up a bit (tu)

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Loopy Logic
  • New Member
  • New Member
  • Thanks: 0

Re: Re: Vaal Sand Tuesday

13 years 8 months ago
#159228
2cents Wrote:
> LL I was just revving you up a bit (tu)


You know I LIKE IT X(

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Observer
  • New Member
  • New Member
  • Thanks: 0

Re: Re: Vaal Sand Tuesday

13 years 8 months ago
#159419
gregbucks Wrote:
> Observer Wrote:
>
>
> > Totally baffling results...top jocks on horses
> > with good form, nowhere to be seen in the last
> > race
>
> Who, Strydom??

Yes, amazing how jocks can win on chance rides ( something to be looked into), and perform badly on pre-booked rides....top jocks do have the preference, or so I, and the public are led to believe??????

A really good ride, allright, the punters are been taken for a really good ride....free public money

Stats will show how many a chance ride has won, and has stuffed, up bets taken before the chance ride was made "public".., and has resulted in good exotic payouts.

Majority of punters use the daily news papers, or available form to make their selections, well before racing starts, and do not have access to the latest updates on jockey changes or scratchings

"TRANSPARENCY MY ARSE".

Suck up, and you will keep on licking

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • rob faux
  • New Member
  • New Member
  • Thanks: 0

Re: Re: Vaal Sand Tuesday

13 years 8 months ago
#159420
An interesting thing that you raise Observer.........the success of pick-up or chance rides does seem to have a particularly high strike rate......would be interesting if there are any stats. to show whether that is real or a perception caused by presenters always pointing them out.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.112 seconds