Sectional timing is here!

Nothing they say can change the fact that its faulty. Loads of races....according to their S times...horse 'A' is infront when its clearly 'horse b' when you watch the replay...That brings into question the sectional times of not just that whole race...but the entire Data of it so far

...I'm very surprised that no one has realized that we are the guinea pigs of a system developing and changing as the supplier with no proven references scrambles to try make it work here ...maybe when Robyn settles in the UK she can do an expose' on the pimpernel Irishman.... as judging by his CV..... has leap frogged from one failed venture to another.... :ohmy:

This service doesn't seem to be available for all meetings . e.g The Cub trial that African night sky won on the 9th at Greyville or its previous run on the 19th of May.
Maybe I'm blind but I definitely don't see it there!!
Is it only for Jhb?

After Vaal Sand was closed spent 3 years of sectional time analysis with accurate Trackus / Singapore racing which incl. establishing standard times per class and section distance - massive time input.
Produced some benefits not 'clearly' evident with 'final time' speed ratings yet took 4 times longer to process results (5 hours per meeting) mostly without enhanced benefit for predicting/using in forthcoming races.

Probable that tight oval tracks (poly or turf) produce a more consistent pace.

Overall the benefits did not justify the input. May do on long turf tracks but the data must be accurate

malcolm dixon wrote: After Vaal Sand was closed spent 3 years of sectional time analysis with accurate Trackus / Singapore racing which incl. establishing standard times per class and section distance - massive time input.
Produced some benefits not 'clearly' evident with 'final time' speed ratings yet took 4 times longer to process results (5 hours per meeting) mostly without enhanced benefit for predicting/using in forthcoming races.

Probable that tight oval tracks (poly or turf) produce a more consistent pace.

Overall the benefits did not justify the input. May do on long turf tracks but the data must be accurate

I havent done Singapore long...for abt 6 weeks than dumped it than started again 2weeks back.I for 1 find their sectional timing absolutely brilliant.Even better than that of HK as it has 100m splits aswell. Im still in the process of gathering a large amount of data to get standard sectionals....but so far its well worth it. ST's are in my opinion for those who enjoy puzzles and who REALLY want to be part of that 'TRUE 1%' of successfull full time punters. So dont give up so easily...its well worth it. Today at Kranji Race 1 was the PERFECT example of a MASSIVE overlay and only those with an understanding of sectionals couldve spotted that. Same goes for Race 5. So get cracking:)

Am I looking in the wrong place, or have Tellytrack moved this feature into their INFORMED subscription area?

John Sweet wrote: Am I looking in the wrong place, or have Tellytrack moved this feature into their INFORMED subscription area?

Can`t see it anywhere?

Bob Brogan wrote:

John Sweet wrote: Am I looking in the wrong place, or have Tellytrack moved this feature into their INFORMED subscription area?

Can`t see it anywhere?

.....now you see it then you don't.....pretty much sums up the pimpernelesque nature of the system, its provider and all involved.... :oops:

was incorrect and useless anyways. joh i was so excited abt this.Luckily for me im betting less and less on Sa Racing...so couldnt care less anymore.

heinrich wrote: was incorrect and useless anyways. joh i was so excited abt this.Luckily for me im betting less and less on Sa Racing...so couldnt care less anymore.

Are you taking your HK bets on the tote though?

Bob Brogan wrote:

heinrich wrote: was incorrect and useless anyways. joh i was so excited abt this.Luckily for me im betting less and less on Sa Racing...so couldnt care less anymore.

Are you taking your HK bets on the tote though?

Win bets at bookies...place bets on tote Bob.