27 July Vaal

Sbundlas wrote: A horse with no name banker

sucker wrote:

Over the Air wrote: de Kock in the 5th would only need 2 working legs to beat that lot

find a bookmaker to lay this horse to you..can't possibly win

Pirhobeta wrote:

Sbundlas wrote: A horse with no name banker

nice win

Lionel wrote:

Form Fundi wrote:

Deeno wrote:

Form Fundi wrote:

Deeno wrote:

Lucky_Dude wrote: You not worried about the De Kock first timer Deeno?

No. Should I be worried??
La Collossa now 4/10. Having said that, we have all seen 4/10 shots been rolled over in recent times.

IMO the 4/10 is too short. Punting shouldn't be about buying money.

FF
I beg to differ.
For me it is about showing a profit.

In this case, it is 70% return on investment cos I took 7/10 yesterday

I hear you and I respect your decision, for me with a few exceptions I 'don't back 2yr olds that are in the red. The 2yr olds all improve at different rates and Serendipity was less than a length behind La Collossa last run.

FF, you punted Billy Silver on the nose yesterday, first timer at that. At least this horse has some form, and was backed first time out against winners.

Deeno wrote:

Form Fundi wrote: Discuss the card.

La Collossa still some 7/10 available

will start much much shorter

oscar wrote: Plum British

Deeno wrote:

Form Fundi wrote:

Deeno wrote:

Lucky_Dude wrote: You not worried about the De Kock first timer Deeno?

No. Should I be worried??
La Collossa now 4/10. Having said that, we have all seen 4/10 shots been rolled over in recent times.

IMO the 4/10 is too short. Punting shouldn't be about buying money.

FF
I beg to differ.
For me it is about showing a profit.

In this case, it is 70% return on investment cos I took 7/10 yesterday

Just Another Tipster wrote: Lauren of rochelle 3/1..my best bet