Greyville Wednesday 27/1/16

Lucky_Dude wrote:

Lucky_Dude wrote:

keniza999 wrote: Trini's now 18/10???? bookies are gambling today.

Maybe they know something you don't...

I took some 22/10 on Interbet... Holding thumbs..

well done, easy game this.... :lol:

I just worked out that I got 66% more profit because I bet on Interbet instead of the tote on that win, and that's after all of Interbet's deductions. Where's the value in the tote the presenters talk about? I would have been furious had I bet on the tote.

Gareth wrote: Correct me if I'm wrong pirates, but surely the info you demanding would be quite different yesterday as it will be today? Surely no info is better than inaccurate info?

very simple when you take a pen reading around 3pm the day before a meeting and there is no more rain the next days reading is not much lower than that one plus the false rail is massive information and how much irrigation and rain the track has had...when you study form 24 to 48 hours before a meeting and start structuring your bets how horses act in different going is massive plus the false rail how deep or shallow it is can negate a wide draw..betting comes out 24 to 48 hours on some sites so if you have an idea of the above you can take some doubles or trebles with meetings going on that day or evening...the info given the day before by the other centres is very accurate and there is NO EXCUSE FOR NATAL TO BE ANY DIFFERENT OR IS THERE?if you believe we should be different maybe we should take the pen reading a half an hour before the 1st race and not 5 hours before the 1st as that will also be deemed inaccurate as per your question

pirates wrote:

Gareth wrote: Correct me if I'm wrong pirates, but surely the info you demanding would be quite different yesterday as it will be today? Surely no info is better than inaccurate info?

very simple when you take a pen reading around 3pm the day before a meeting and there is no more rain the next days reading is not much lower than that one plus the false rail is massive information and how much irrigation and rain the track has had...when you study form 24 to 48 hours before a meeting and start structuring your bets how horses act in different going is massive plus the false rail how deep or shallow it is can negate a wide draw..betting comes out 24 to 48 hours on some sites so if you have an idea of the above you can take some doubles or trebles with meetings going on that day or evening...the info given the day before by the other centres is very accurate and there is NO EXCUSE FOR NATAL TO BE ANY DIFFERENT OR IS THERE?if you believe we should be different maybe we should take the pen reading a half an hour before the 1st race and not 5 hours before the 1st as that will also be deemed inaccurate as per your question

100% if you are treating punting in a professional manner then the operator should do similar with track maintenance and information dissemination. With the mess Scottsville and Greyville have been lately, I think that it would be beneficial for the course manager to walk the course the afternoon before a meeting and publish race conditions and then do the same on the morning of the meeting and publish again. The proof of failure is there for all to see with the SPRINT FESTIVAL being the norm not the exception at Scottsville now!!

Translunar for me with Auction King a danger perhaps.

I'm worried about the Lunn stable getting several hotties rolled lately!

Mr H you want him to walk the course ?..........whats the chances ?........with all that lightning about......maybe disappear into a hole.....or see the problems.....too much work !!