Clairwood 9/10/13
- Guest
-
- Visitor
-
Re: Re: Clairwood 9/10/13
11 years 8 months ago
Non of ours gets the stamp Englander ?
Just asking
Just asking
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- shrek
-
- New Member
-
- Thanks: 0
Re: Re: Clairwood 9/10/13
11 years 8 months ago
oscar Wrote:
> Newton Abbott good tomorrow
All the best Oscar, hope he runs a big race for you. (tu)
> Newton Abbott good tomorrow
All the best Oscar, hope he runs a big race for you. (tu)
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Guest
-
- Visitor
-
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- mr hawaii
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 20065
- Thanks: 2653
Re: Re: Clairwood 9/10/13
11 years 8 months ago
Pirhobeta Wrote:
> Gary The Great....back over a shorter distance
> with Blinkers....stable swinger with Sergeant
> Tibbs.
such a strong formline and will be involved
MR PRESIDENT is place value race 1 as is MALUTI race 5 -
> Gary The Great....back over a shorter distance
> with Blinkers....stable swinger with Sergeant
> Tibbs.
such a strong formline and will be involved
MR PRESIDENT is place value race 1 as is MALUTI race 5 -
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- shrek
-
- New Member
-
- Thanks: 0
Re: Re: Clairwood 9/10/13
11 years 8 months ago
Ben-Hur Wrote:
> Well done yesterday Shrek
Thanks Ben Hur. (tu)
> Well done yesterday Shrek
Thanks Ben Hur. (tu)
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- shrek
-
- New Member
-
- Thanks: 0
Re: Re: Clairwood 9/10/13
11 years 8 months ago
Englander Wrote:
> Titch Wrote:
>
>
> > So You Think @ 9/2 represents a "free bet" will
> > have to fall over to miss the first 3 (11/10 to
> > place) and will take a LOT of beating.....
>
> (tu)
My only worry is what if he loses more than 6 lengths at the start. If he loses anything less than that he must be a massive runner on his last two runs. However these slow starters worry me that somewhere along the line they don't jump at all.
> Titch Wrote:
>
>
> > So You Think @ 9/2 represents a "free bet" will
> > have to fall over to miss the first 3 (11/10 to
> > place) and will take a LOT of beating.....
>
> (tu)
My only worry is what if he loses more than 6 lengths at the start. If he loses anything less than that he must be a massive runner on his last two runs. However these slow starters worry me that somewhere along the line they don't jump at all.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Titch
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 9397
- Thanks: 366
Re: Re: Clairwood 9/10/13
11 years 8 months ago
shrek Wrote:
> My only worry is what if he loses more than 6
> lengths at the start. If he loses anything less
> than that he must be a massive runner on his last
> two runs. However these slow starters worry me
> that somewhere along the line they don't jump at
> all.
Cormack will nullify that
> My only worry is what if he loses more than 6
> lengths at the start. If he loses anything less
> than that he must be a massive runner on his last
> two runs. However these slow starters worry me
> that somewhere along the line they don't jump at
> all.
Cormack will nullify that

Give everything but up!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Englander
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 11538
- Thanks: 829
Re: Re: Clairwood 9/10/13
11 years 8 months ago
Morning Ben... King H in the 2nd would have been my strongest of the day but, despite the new false rail, it appears from results that high numbers are still very much favoured which gives her a very tough ask. Will hopefully put up other selections later but, yes, there are a couple of others I like that have already been mentioned here (tu)
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Titch
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 9397
- Thanks: 366
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- shrek
-
- New Member
-
- Thanks: 0
Re: Re: Clairwood 9/10/13
11 years 8 months ago
Titch Wrote:
> shrek Wrote:
>
>
>
> > My only worry is what if he loses more than 6
> > lengths at the start. If he loses anything less
> > than that he must be a massive runner on his
> last
> > two runs. However these slow starters worry me
> > that somewhere along the line they don't jump
> at
> > all.
>
> Cormack will nullify that
I hope so because bar the start I also think he is a good bet. (tu)
> shrek Wrote:
>
>
>
> > My only worry is what if he loses more than 6
> > lengths at the start. If he loses anything less
> > than that he must be a massive runner on his
> last
> > two runs. However these slow starters worry me
> > that somewhere along the line they don't jump
> at
> > all.
>
> Cormack will nullify that

I hope so because bar the start I also think he is a good bet. (tu)
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- zesto
-
- New Member
-
- Thanks: 0
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Guest
-
- Visitor
-
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.127 seconds