Vaal Thursday

Didn't have any of those mentioned in my pa....()

Thanks OR... that day Senator had the 1 box (VR was in 3) and was VR's second run after a rest, as was its run with Tiger Attack though I am not sure that syndrome affects this horse. And that makes VR 3kgs better off for a 0.7 loss. It just makes no sense. I am not necessarily going to back VR, just don't understand it!

shrek Wrote:

---

> My old man also uses similar horses from different
> races to compare form. On a line through Tiger
> Attach, Reign Victorious should beat Senator but a
> line through Chop Suey would have the form is in
> favour of Senator. I will take some of the 12/1
> (3/1 a place) on offer at Betting World on Chop
> Suey who regularly finishes on top of the two
> mentioned.

lol Shrek... I also like Chop Suey to do them both (tu) but I mostly asked to try and understand the betting a little more, the difference in price between Senator and VR (and Chop) is to my mind crazy... and I'm not saying Senator won't win but if the price difference is solely because of the jockey then its madness imho

Englander Wrote:

---

> Thanks OR... that day Senator had the 1 box (VR
> was in 3) and was VR's second run after a rest, as
> was its run with Tiger Attack though I am not sure
> that syndrome affects this horse. And that makes
> VR 3kgs better off for a 0.7 loss. It just makes
> no sense. I am not necessarily going to back VR,
> just don't understand it!

The only other factor could be the jock. Mho

Englander Wrote:

---

> shrek Wrote:
>

---

>

---

> > My old man also uses similar horses from
> different
> > races to compare form. On a line through Tiger
> > Attach, Reign Victorious should beat Senator but
> a
> > line through Chop Suey would have the form is
> in
> > favour of Senator. I will take some of the 12/1
> > (3/1 a place) on offer at Betting World on Chop
> > Suey who regularly finishes on top of the two
> > mentioned.
>
> lol Shrek... I also like Chop Suey to do them both
> (tu) but I mostly asked to try and understand the
> betting a little more, the difference in price
> between Senator and VR (and Chop) is to my mind
> crazy... and I'm not saying Senator won't win but
> if the price difference is solely because of the
> jockey then its madness imho


I agree I ofter see horses priced up IMO the wrong way round. That is good for us as there should be value in it for us. (tu)

Personally I don't think there is much between Senator and Reign Victorious and both must go into the PA - dak horse for me is Milkwood Manor who is better this trip - imo the Rambo form is weak :

Another runner that I think could be some value is Wells Cargo in the 7th - he is not consistent but has a chance on his best runs imo (tu)

Frodo, i am ''hoping'' Scott Kenny has a good day today....

the first looks to be wide open, i like the 14 where eagles dare

shrek, where's that PA - I'm struggling to find a leg where I need only 2 runners :S

Hoping for this treble this is all I will play
Race 2 2
Race 6 10
Race 8 2

Frodo Wrote:

---

> shrek, where's that PA - I'm struggling to find a
> leg where I need only 2 runners :S


Frodo at ths stage my PA cost R9,600 so am trying to see where I can cut down. <

shrek


mine cost R36k DONT cut down post it please ill post mine