Punch and Judy show

rob faux Wrote:

---

> Darryl was unhappy with the
> remuneration.............that is a financial
> problem.............lol


They are currently paying more for less..:S

I agree with most of the above - but imo at least Julie has improved - she does not blindly tip the favorites as she used to - seems to make an effort at least to study the form lines (as does NK) - BUT her neverending 'chirps' are most irritating.

Imo there still is only one bloke (well not any more) that is capable of adding value in previewing race - and they let him get away :

What ever Darryl was looking for in terms of wages it has to be less than paying 2 presenters to do selections and if not then could not be much more...there is no doubt that DM brings more to the betting public table than Rod and Julie do, this is one instance when 2 heads are definitely not better than one.....the diff imo is that when I back a horse and Rod and/or Julie tip the danger to win then I feel like 'pressing" my bet but when Darryl went against my selection I would without exception save on his selection..and I'm sure i'm not the only one ..

Julie is more irritating but is a far better tipster than Rod who is out of his depth up here

mr hawaii Wrote:

---

> Julie is more irritating but is a far better
> tipster than Rod who is out of his depth up here


I agree with you here Mr H.......but the 2 of them together trying to show each other up on live television becomes a bit irritating.....that's why i call for them to be seperating......that should be the bare minimum!

PK a separation would be ok but a divorce is better with no visitation rights for either of them -

Complete disaster these two are. It is like watching two 13 year olds trying to flirt with each other. Do they not know how embarasing they are.

As mentioned before how Ken and TT could let this carry on for this long is beyond me.

The most amazing thing about these sorts of issues is that 'P' simply just ignores public opinion.

These clowns get worse and worse and nothings been done abt it bladdy disgrace

WISH THEY KNEW WE ARE NOT INTERESTED IN THEIR FING OPINION WE WUD FAR RATHER HAVE MIKE DE KOCKS BEFORE THE RACE WHAT USE IS IT AFTERWARDS I ASK YOU?

IMO Julie was far better when she started out than she is at present. So what caused her to change for the worse. To me the root cause is MANAGEMNT who set the modus operandi and Julie & Rod are just carring out their employer's instructions.

The 'show' they put on is not up to standard but I cannot believe that with Julie's pedegree in Horse Racing that she cannot read Form. My thought is that Management have INSTRUCTED her & him not to get and/or pass on relevant info e.g. Tainer/Jockey input.

THe women mixes and minces her words besides her irritating voice she's been a presenter long enuf now not to make a fool of herself in the public eye its time for her to move on get married and give her parents gandchildren