Sporting Post says merger disallowed
- umlilo
-
- New Member
-
- Thanks: 0
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Flash Harry
-
- New Member
-
- Thanks: 0
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Muhtiman
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 8932
- Thanks: 1014
Re: Re: Sporting Post says merger disallowed
12 years 8 months ago
Flash Harry Wrote:
> muhti re malakka what you mean? is this woman no
> cry wha wha wha about phumelela? why she no
> appear? where is the money? may be she spend it
> all in the R20 MILLION race in plett????
<
I don't want to get into a political debate on this issue as I also feel that this Pindi is a brass....but in our fair land to piss on the brass when it has connected influence and start a media mud slinging match to try and discredit them is asking for trouble.....specially if your own house is not inorder.....I voiced my complaint when the TBA/P/other racing elitists had a go at her in the press....they were just stoking a fire by doing so......now they must find a way to put it out....poor Pindi.....she showed them
> muhti re malakka what you mean? is this woman no
> cry wha wha wha about phumelela? why she no
> appear? where is the money? may be she spend it
> all in the R20 MILLION race in plett????

I don't want to get into a political debate on this issue as I also feel that this Pindi is a brass....but in our fair land to piss on the brass when it has connected influence and start a media mud slinging match to try and discredit them is asking for trouble.....specially if your own house is not inorder.....I voiced my complaint when the TBA/P/other racing elitists had a go at her in the press....they were just stoking a fire by doing so......now they must find a way to put it out....poor Pindi.....she showed them
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Gajima
-
- New Member
-
- Thanks: 0
Re: Re: Sporting Post says merger disallowed
12 years 8 months ago
Here is a report on some of the proceedings so far. Very revealing indeed.
www.bdlive.co.za/companies/2012/10/11/co...on-upsets-bookmakers
www.bdlive.co.za/companies/2012/10/11/co...on-upsets-bookmakers
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Dave Scott
-
- Administrator
-
- Posts: 43867
- Thanks: 3338
Re: Re: Sporting Post says merger disallowed
12 years 8 months ago
Thanks Gajima, should be a few interesting twists and turns.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- umlilo
-
- New Member
-
- Thanks: 0
Re: Re: Sporting Post says merger disallowed
12 years 8 months ago
@gajima:
on their track record of having a monopoly in Gauteng for 10 years, I don't see how P can ever raise an objectiuon against the arguments made by Marshalls on bookmaking licences in the W Cape?
on their track record of having a monopoly in Gauteng for 10 years, I don't see how P can ever raise an objectiuon against the arguments made by Marshalls on bookmaking licences in the W Cape?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- classicl
-
- New Member
-
- Thanks: 0
Re: Re: Sporting Post says merger disallowed
12 years 8 months ago
"300 bookmakers contributing R5 billion towards betting turnover"- "How much toward the stakes pot?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Magi
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 9396
- Thanks: 1252
Re: Re: Sporting Post says merger disallowed
12 years 8 months ago
Some bold statements there from both sides... hopefully they can support their arguments with concrete facts. Hopefully the commission INSISTS on seeing the facts, not conhecture, extrapolations etcetera.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Bob Brogan
-
- Administrator
-
- Posts: 82502
- Thanks: 6452
Re: Re: Sporting Post says merger disallowed
12 years 8 months ago
Purple Capital CEO blasts Phumelela
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Dave Scott
-
- Administrator
-
- Posts: 43867
- Thanks: 3338
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Deeno
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 8174
- Thanks: 483
Re: Re: Sporting Post says merger disallowed
12 years 8 months ago
Phum "savaged"
Well Done Sir
Well Done Sir
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- umlilo
-
- New Member
-
- Thanks: 0
Re: Re: Sporting Post says merger disallowed
12 years 8 months ago
Similar to some of other sectors major of our economy (mining, banking, retail and industrial), the handful of white elitist capitalists have hijacked BEE with a handful of opportunist blacks to ensure perpetual, unquestionable control of our economy to the detriment of the mass.
Herein, where are the blacks in Phumelela? We hear the chariman is black but do we ever hear from him / see him? Is he colourblind to the absence of blacks within the industry? Is he deaf to the gripes of the owners, trainers, breeders, punters, grooms, tellers, stripping of assets, absence of accountability, jobs for pals/family, etc? We are told of BEE partners / procurement; where / who are they?
Has mention been made of the fact that Phumelela (directly/indirectly) pays/subsidises the 'self-regulating' body (NHA)for its operational costs? That major share-holders / directors of P serve/ have served on this body? That they continue to do so via trainers (of their numerous horses country-wide) who serve on such bodies in the various regions?
Not conflicts of interest?
If these are not classic examples of a fully manipulated monopolistic situation, what else is?
I forget, as a 'not black enough black', I should not be making such observations to hurt the sensitivities of our people!
:S
Herein, where are the blacks in Phumelela? We hear the chariman is black but do we ever hear from him / see him? Is he colourblind to the absence of blacks within the industry? Is he deaf to the gripes of the owners, trainers, breeders, punters, grooms, tellers, stripping of assets, absence of accountability, jobs for pals/family, etc? We are told of BEE partners / procurement; where / who are they?
Has mention been made of the fact that Phumelela (directly/indirectly) pays/subsidises the 'self-regulating' body (NHA)for its operational costs? That major share-holders / directors of P serve/ have served on this body? That they continue to do so via trainers (of their numerous horses country-wide) who serve on such bodies in the various regions?
Not conflicts of interest?
If these are not classic examples of a fully manipulated monopolistic situation, what else is?
I forget, as a 'not black enough black', I should not be making such observations to hurt the sensitivities of our people!
:S
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.123 seconds