Vaal Sand Tuesday
- Guest
-
- Visitor
-
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- gregbucks
-
- New Member
-
- Thanks: 0
Re: Re: Vaal Sand Tuesday
14 years 6 months ago
East don't be shy to take the swinger with Supa Status:)
Frodo the same can be said of Spies horses, most inconsistent around imo....
Frodo the same can be said of Spies horses, most inconsistent around imo....
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Bob Brogan
-
Topic Author
- Administrator
-
- Posts: 82528
- Thanks: 6462
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- gregbucks
-
- New Member
-
- Thanks: 0
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- antsinner
-
- New Member
-
- Thanks: 0
Re: Re: Vaal Sand Tuesday
14 years 6 months ago
ditto Greg !!!
i missed hundreds of pa's on Ice crusher , not a drum :S
i missed hundreds of pa's on Ice crusher , not a drum :S
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- magiclips
-
- New Member
-
- Thanks: 0
Re: Re: Vaal Sand Tuesday
14 years 6 months ago
Frodo Wrote:
> hibernia Wrote:
>
>
> > Bad idea running Swan Neck in race 5?
>
>
> Maybe not - I think the rules states that she
> can't get penalized for placing in a conditions
> race; so she will go into a handicap next time
> again at the same MR?
Oh yes indeed, Frodo. Even I could be tempted into a wee bet when that happens (unless she's 4/10 or something, of course).(
> hibernia Wrote:
>
>
> > Bad idea running Swan Neck in race 5?
>
>
> Maybe not - I think the rules states that she
> can't get penalized for placing in a conditions
> race; so she will go into a handicap next time
> again at the same MR?
Oh yes indeed, Frodo. Even I could be tempted into a wee bet when that happens (unless she's 4/10 or something, of course).(

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- gregbucks
-
- New Member
-
- Thanks: 0
Re: Re: Vaal Sand Tuesday
14 years 6 months ago
antsinner Wrote:
> ditto Greg !!!
>
> i missed hundreds of pa's on Ice crusher , not a
> drum :S
Stiffs Antsinner, that last race result still has me puzzled
> ditto Greg !!!
>
> i missed hundreds of pa's on Ice crusher , not a
> drum :S
Stiffs Antsinner, that last race result still has me puzzled
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- umlilo
-
- New Member
-
- Thanks: 0
Re: Re: Vaal Sand Tuesday
14 years 6 months ago
@antsinner & gregbucks:
They say 'that's racing!'
Change the name to 'lottery'!
that result farked me up also!
How does anybody justify such upsets (I mean, amongst the 'protectors of the integrity' of this georgeous sport!)?
(td) :X
They say 'that's racing!'
Change the name to 'lottery'!
that result farked me up also!
How does anybody justify such upsets (I mean, amongst the 'protectors of the integrity' of this georgeous sport!)?
(td) :X
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Frodo
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 13144
- Thanks: 3040
Re: Re: Vaal Sand Tuesday
14 years 6 months ago
antsinner Wrote:
> ditto Greg !!!
>
> i missed hundreds of pa's on Ice crusher , not a
> drum :S
Another case begging for an investigation by the stipes imo - Rocket Propulsion finished 19 lengths behind just a week ago on this surface - and yes I'm speaking from my pocket - had 4 horses in the PA and could only mange a dirty 4th:(
> ditto Greg !!!
>
> i missed hundreds of pa's on Ice crusher , not a
> drum :S
Another case begging for an investigation by the stipes imo - Rocket Propulsion finished 19 lengths behind just a week ago on this surface - and yes I'm speaking from my pocket - had 4 horses in the PA and could only mange a dirty 4th:(
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- umlilo
-
- New Member
-
- Thanks: 0
Re: Re: Vaal Sand Tuesday
14 years 6 months ago
@frodo:
they should be suspending trainers and not the poor horse!
this is a 2nd recent 'upset' from the stable in recent weeks!
if nothing sinister, then how come a 50/1 shot pays under R40? Should have paid at least R70!
any bets on the books?
or, are such bets 'under the table'?
they should be suspending trainers and not the poor horse!
this is a 2nd recent 'upset' from the stable in recent weeks!
if nothing sinister, then how come a 50/1 shot pays under R40? Should have paid at least R70!
any bets on the books?
or, are such bets 'under the table'?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- pirates
-
- New Member
-
- Thanks: 0
Re: Re: Vaal Sand Tuesday
14 years 6 months ago
umlilo Wrote:
> @frodo:
>
> they should be suspending trainers and not the
> poor horse!
>
> this is a 2nd recent 'upset' from the stable in
> recent weeks!
>
> if nothing sinister, then how come a 50/1 shot
> pays under R40? Should have paid at least R70!
>
> any bets on the books?
>
> or, are such bets 'under the table'?
UMLILO IF ITS SO DAMN EASY THEN TAKE YOUR TRAINERS LICENSE OUT...YOU SPEAK SHIT
> @frodo:
>
> they should be suspending trainers and not the
> poor horse!
>
> this is a 2nd recent 'upset' from the stable in
> recent weeks!
>
> if nothing sinister, then how come a 50/1 shot
> pays under R40? Should have paid at least R70!
>
> any bets on the books?
>
> or, are such bets 'under the table'?
UMLILO IF ITS SO DAMN EASY THEN TAKE YOUR TRAINERS LICENSE OUT...YOU SPEAK SHIT
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- antsinner
-
- New Member
-
- Thanks: 0
Re: Re: Vaal Sand Tuesday
14 years 6 months ago
Frodo Wrote:
> antsinner Wrote:
>
>
> > ditto Greg !!!
> >
> > i missed hundreds of pa's on Ice crusher , not
> a
> > drum :S
>
>
> Another case begging for an investigation by the
> stipes imo - Rocket Propulsion finished 19 lengths
> behind just a week ago on this surface - and yes
> I'm speaking from my pocket - had 4 horses in the
> PA and could only mange a dirty 4th:(
It seems the blokes preparing this surface are not doing it properly , i can only comment from my observing that this track was running heavy today . They always say the track is running "standard" , BULLSHIT !!! . It was slow today . Look at the mediocre times that where recorded today barring the 5th & 7th race . Fantasia island clocked one of the slowest times this year over 1800m on the sand .
The track manager must get his act together and get that track to run consistently . They have a certain indicator which they work with at the vaal but it seems they dont use it . Maybe they just prepare certain parts of the track and leave others , i dont know . If they wanted to they could manipulate or doctor that track anyway they want to .
They had a few mm of rain this week , so they probably didnt water the track enough !
If racing continues like this at the vaal then i can just aswell go play the lotto or start punting the casinos again .
> antsinner Wrote:
>
>
> > ditto Greg !!!
> >
> > i missed hundreds of pa's on Ice crusher , not
> a
> > drum :S
>
>
> Another case begging for an investigation by the
> stipes imo - Rocket Propulsion finished 19 lengths
> behind just a week ago on this surface - and yes
> I'm speaking from my pocket - had 4 horses in the
> PA and could only mange a dirty 4th:(
It seems the blokes preparing this surface are not doing it properly , i can only comment from my observing that this track was running heavy today . They always say the track is running "standard" , BULLSHIT !!! . It was slow today . Look at the mediocre times that where recorded today barring the 5th & 7th race . Fantasia island clocked one of the slowest times this year over 1800m on the sand .
The track manager must get his act together and get that track to run consistently . They have a certain indicator which they work with at the vaal but it seems they dont use it . Maybe they just prepare certain parts of the track and leave others , i dont know . If they wanted to they could manipulate or doctor that track anyway they want to .
They had a few mm of rain this week , so they probably didnt water the track enough !
If racing continues like this at the vaal then i can just aswell go play the lotto or start punting the casinos again .
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.112 seconds